Access variant52.ru. "ВАРИАНТ-52", Янаул

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

72/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.202

61/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

86/100

10%

variant52.ru

678 ms

style.css

269 ms

cnt.share.js

12 ms

a1.jpg

288 ms

openapi.js

389 ms

Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 32% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Variant52.ru, 11% (12 requests) were made to Vk.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Avatars-fast.yandex.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Variant52.ru.

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

487.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Variant52.ru main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 443.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 178.2 kB

Original 213.3 kB
After minification 205.7 kB
After compression 35.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 178.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 12.1 kB

Original 326.3 kB
After minification 314.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Variant 52 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 313.6 kB

Original 443.7 kB
After minification 380.4 kB
After compression 130.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 313.6 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 44.1 kB

Original 52.7 kB
After minification 36.3 kB
After compression 8.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Variant52.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Variant 52. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

RU
Language Claimed

N/A
Encoding

WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Variant52.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Variant52.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

variant52.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Variant 52. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

"ВАРИАНТ-52", Янаул

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

variant52.ru

style.css

cnt.share.js

a1.jpg

openapi.js

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

variant52.ru

style.css

cnt.share.js

a1.jpg

openapi.js

brand

plusone.js

brand

exp

a2.jpg

a5.gif

a4.gif

variant52.jpg

52.png

pozhar-v-yanaule2.jpg

reklama-na-saite.png

yandex-oskorbil-yanaul.jpg

napishi-v-gazety.jpg

vkontakte-yanaul.jpg

top10.jpg

dtp-gudburovo.jpg

trubnyj-zavod-v-yanaule1.jpg

konkurs-5.jpg

samolet-avariya-neftekamsk2.jpg

mechet-v-yanaulskom-rajone1.jpg

detsad-solnyshko-progress1.jpg

roszhkh1.jpg

sanatorij-hazino1.jpg

vzryv-kotelnoy-v-yanaule-21.jpg

almazu-v-yanaule1.jpg

fire1.jpg

avtovory-v-yanaule1.jpg

novyj-oblik-yanaula1.jpg

manyak-v-yanaule1.jpg

jdi-menya-yanaul1.jpg

nomer.jpg

sms2325.jpg

foto5.jpg

0012.jpg

adsbygoogle.js

sspmultimatch

a3.gif

context.js