Tools & Wizards About Us
verbraucherschutz-forum.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 3

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

verbraucherschutz-forum.de

FRA-Forum: Unser Flughafen-Forum

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

271 ms

Resources Loaded

6.3 sec

Page Rendered

119 ms

verbraucherschutz-forum.de screenshot

About Website

Visit verbraucherschutz-forum.de now to see the best up-to-date Verbraucherschutz Forum content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about verbraucherschutz-forum.de

Auf Flughafen.User-Forum.de werden die wichtigsten Informationen im Kontext des Ausbaus und Betriebs des Frankfurter Flughafens zusammengetragen, protokolliert und für Interessierte und Betroffene ber...

Visit verbraucherschutz-forum.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Verbraucherschutz-forum.de page load time and found that the first response time was 271 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

verbraucherschutz-forum.de performance score

3

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.4 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value18,740 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.204

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

verbraucherschutz-forum.de

271 ms

www.verbraucherschutz-forum.de

5787 ms

space.gif

240 ms

arbl.gif

254 ms

arbl.gif

177 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Verbraucherschutz-forum.de, 75% (9 requests) were made to Cs-wim.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Verbraucherschutz-forum.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 62.0 kB (80%)

Content Size

77.7 kB

After Optimization

15.7 kB

  • HTML

In fact, the total size of Verbraucherschutz-forum.de main page is 77.7 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 77.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 62.0 kB

  • Original 77.7 kB
  • After minification 74.8 kB
  • After compression 15.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (90%)

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

1

  • Images

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Verbraucherschutz Forum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

verbraucherschutz-forum.de

verbraucherschutz-forum.de

271 ms

www.verbraucherschutz-forum.de

www.verbraucherschutz-forum.de

5787 ms

space.gif

space.gif

240 ms

arbl.gif

arbl.gif

254 ms

arbl.gif

arbl.gif

177 ms

show1.gif

show1.gif

260 ms

arb.gif

arb.gif

259 ms

Vchat-ico.gif

Vchat-ico.gif

190 ms

ironisch.gif

ironisch.gif

191 ms

Vinfo-ico.gif

Vinfo-ico.gif

233 ms

i35-type.gif

i35-type.gif

254 ms

down.gif

down.gif

271 ms

Accessibility Review

verbraucherschutz-forum.de accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

ARIA tooltip elements do not have accessible names.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

verbraucherschutz-forum.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

verbraucherschutz-forum.de SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Verbraucherschutz-forum.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Verbraucherschutz-forum.de main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

verbraucherschutz-forum.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Verbraucherschutz Forum. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: