1.9 sec in total
334 ms
1.4 sec
121 ms
Welcome to vergleiche.de homepage info - get ready to check VERGLEICHE best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about vergleiche.de
VERGLEICHE.de hilft Ihnen, Ihre Wunschprodukte schnell und einfach zu suchen und zu vergleichen.
Visit vergleiche.deWe analyzed Vergleiche.de page load time and found that the first response time was 334 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
vergleiche.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
22/100
10%
Value10.1 s
0/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value12,370 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value21.2 s
1/100
10%
334 ms
323 ms
181 ms
109 ms
53 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Vergleiche.de, 55% (22 requests) were made to Images.pangora.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (510 ms) relates to the external source Images.pangora.com.
Page size can be reduced by 70.4 kB (33%)
214.7 kB
144.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Vergleiche.de main page is 214.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 102.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. VERGLEICHE images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 33.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.5 kB or 44% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (12%)
34
30
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of VERGLEICHE. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
vergleiche.de
334 ms
www.vergleiche.de
323 ms
main.css.var__201602111536
181 ms
homepage;tile=1;sz=728x90;ord=1456779244
109 ms
homepage;tile=2;dcopt=ist;sz=160x600;ord=1456779244
53 ms
conversion.js
19 ms
main.js.var__201602111536
360 ms
gtm.js
76 ms
C_000463664534_DE_800.jpg
213 ms
55 ms
C_000494181201_DE_800.jpg
213 ms
C_000503893550_DE_800.jpg
217 ms
C_000502764483_DE_800.jpg
218 ms
C_000441627813_DE_800.jpg
218 ms
C_000507120001_DE_800.jpg
219 ms
C_000470947373_DE_800.jpg
298 ms
C_000490305426_DE_800.jpg
311 ms
C_000506448441_DE_800.jpg
313 ms
C_000467193426_DE_800.jpg
314 ms
C_000467099522_DE_800.jpg
316 ms
C_000492932265_DE_800.jpg
317 ms
C_000496844441_DE_800.jpg
389 ms
C_000080783177_DE_800.jpg
406 ms
C_000467164721_DE_800.jpg
410 ms
C_000497188225_DE_800.jpg
409 ms
C_000464731193_DE_800.jpg
414 ms
C_000307870434_DE_800.jpg
414 ms
C_000461156635_DE_800.jpg
482 ms
C_000035594248_DE_210.jpg
504 ms
C_000503109682_DE_800.jpg
507 ms
C_000503149270_DE_800.jpg
510 ms
sprite.png__201602111536
347 ms
v_repeats_2.png__201602111536
193 ms
prev.gif__201602111536
194 ms
next.gif__201602111536
195 ms
40 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
ec.js
11 ms
collect
30 ms
collect
58 ms
vergleiche.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
vergleiche.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
vergleiche.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vergleiche.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Vergleiche.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vergleiche.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of VERGLEICHE. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: