18.9 sec in total
333 ms
18.4 sec
156 ms
Click here to check amazing Vergleichen content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vergleichen.de
Der Vergleich der Vergleichsportale ✓ Preise vergleichen, Angebote, Tests ✓ TÜV-geprüfte Vergleiche und Rechner ✓ Preistrends ✓ Ausgezeichnete Partner
Visit vergleichen.deWe analyzed Vergleichen.de page load time and found that the first response time was 333 ms and then it took 18.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
vergleichen.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value5.6 s
54/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.102
89/100
15%
Value5.9 s
65/100
10%
333 ms
3475 ms
194 ms
198 ms
200 ms
Our browser made a total of 118 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Vergleichen.de, 8% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 8% (9 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Vergleichen.de.
Page size can be reduced by 305.8 kB (46%)
659.7 kB
353.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Vergleichen.de main page is 659.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 240.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vergleichen images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 133.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 133.0 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vergleichen.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 82.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 76 (66%)
116
40
The browser has sent 116 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vergleichen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vergleichen.de
333 ms
www.vergleichen.de
3475 ms
d8cb3486c453b26bfaebd5cc8164a287.css
194 ms
0bd18253a1e926d5949a789fb6661009.css
198 ms
aggregator.css
200 ms
node.css
201 ms
poll.css
203 ms
defaults.css
289 ms
system.css
296 ms
system-menus.css
300 ms
user.css
298 ms
content-module.css
300 ms
ctools.css
303 ms
nice_menus.css
384 ms
menu.css
399 ms
panels.css
394 ms
simplenews.css
395 ms
extlink.css
396 ms
fieldgroup.css
403 ms
views.css
480 ms
twocol_bricks.css
492 ms
onecol.css
493 ms
960.css
494 ms
layout.css
499 ms
jquery.js
705 ms
drupal.js
576 ms
de_f5711885f57004dc71bc48cb02441aba.js
590 ms
superfish.js
590 ms
jquery.bgiframe.min.js
592 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
599 ms
nice_menus.js
672 ms
openads.js
687 ms
panels.js
689 ms
poormanscron.js
690 ms
extlink.js
699 ms
e.js
582 ms
header.jpg
302 ms
vergleichen_logo.gif
98 ms
navigation.gif
198 ms
navigation-arrow-right.gif
103 ms
Home-Teaser-Traumurlaub.jpg
201 ms
Home-Teaser-Immokredit.jpg
335 ms
Home-Teaser-Ferienwohnung.jpg
479 ms
Home-Teaser-Oekostrom.jpg
494 ms
arrow.png
295 ms
testsigel-collage.gif
302 ms
shopping-80x80.gif
410 ms
arrow.jpg
411 ms
pauschalreisen-40x40.gif
411 ms
jetzt-vergleichen.gif
434 ms
handy-tarifrechner-40x40.gif
495 ms
fernseher-40x40.gif
503 ms
navigation-gps-40x40.gif
505 ms
immobilien-kredit-40x40.gif
544 ms
immobiliensuche-40x40.gif
575 ms
reise-40x40.gif
591 ms
reisen-80x80.gif
593 ms
sparkalender-80x80.gif
603 ms
energie-80x80.gif
604 ms
JW80253838_80x80.jpg
638 ms
finanzen-versicherung-80x80.gif
670 ms
getImage.php
707 ms
getImage.php
708 ms
getImage.php
727 ms
getImage.php
729 ms
getImage.php
752 ms
getImage.php
780 ms
getImage.php
820 ms
getImage.php
834 ms
singleboersen-80x80.gif
827 ms
ajs.php
374 ms
lg.php
115 ms
shadow-t-yellow.png
446 ms
corner-bits-yellow.png
473 ms
shadow-l-yellow.png
511 ms
shadow-r-yellow.png
523 ms
shadow-b-yellow.png
532 ms
shadow-t.png
547 ms
corner-bits.png
568 ms
shadow-l.png
609 ms
shadow-r.png
646 ms
shadow-b.png
645 ms
sitemap-arrow.gif
646 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
379 ms
274 ms
t.js
441 ms
internet-festnetz-15x15.gif
639 ms
piwik.js
555 ms
energie-15x15.gif
691 ms
sonstiges-15x15.gif
676 ms
reise-15x15.gif
663 ms
finanzen-versicherung-15x15.gif
660 ms
jobs-kontakte-15x15.gif
672 ms
shopping-15x15.gif
712 ms
likebox.php
207 ms
immobilien-15x15.gif
692 ms
bg-bottomnav.jpg
669 ms
menu-leaf.png
658 ms
McLpmVM3wCm.css
175 ms
VH4VPudaxfN.css
217 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
299 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
373 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
321 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
321 ms
cnt_js.php
265 ms
11030723_821147331273993_5970478944512748338_n.jpg
238 ms
11051807_821147807940612_6313128353422279507_n.png
309 ms
10334283_747487855281762_2952175434991753716_n.jpg
350 ms
10574321_330249327149267_3859007025632570899_n.jpg
534 ms
10953398_379590128879802_4385938349386751596_n.jpg
393 ms
12809643_1692267801061713_955831516940703446_n.jpg
394 ms
12195852_908168822612655_2245552953925075822_n.jpg
361 ms
1476359_945996252152418_5554981467028399561_n.jpg
408 ms
376915_108215462663998_683859605_n.jpg
391 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
45 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
45 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
42 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
83 ms
vergleichen.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
<object> elements do not have alternate text
vergleichen.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
vergleichen.de SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vergleichen.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vergleichen.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vergleichen.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vergleichen. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: