11.8 sec in total
3.5 sec
7.6 sec
724 ms
Visit vergleichsportal.eu now to see the best up-to-date Vergleichsportal content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vergleichsportal.eu
Vergleichsportal » Kfz-Versicherung, Private Krankenversicherung und weitere Rechner für Versicherungen finden Sie auf Vergleichsportal.eu
Visit vergleichsportal.euWe analyzed Vergleichsportal.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 3.5 sec and then it took 8.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
vergleichsportal.eu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
Value1.8 s
98/100
25%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
3525 ms
412 ms
198 ms
195 ms
282 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Vergleichsportal.eu, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Vergleichsportal.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 471.8 kB (66%)
712.9 kB
241.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Vergleichsportal.eu main page is 712.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 281.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Vergleichsportal needs image optimization as it can save up to 14.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 203.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 203.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 192.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vergleichsportal.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 192.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (72%)
57
16
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vergleichsportal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.vergleichsportal.eu
3525 ms
style.css
412 ms
style.css
198 ms
style.css
195 ms
font-awesome.min.css
282 ms
simple-line-icons.css
207 ms
style.css
279 ms
css
25 ms
style.css
283 ms
style.responsive.css
284 ms
css
37 ms
jetpack.css
442 ms
style_2.1.2.css
378 ms
jquery.js
566 ms
main.js
373 ms
jquery.mobile.min.js
381 ms
responsiveslides.js
472 ms
main.js
481 ms
main.js
480 ms
jquery-migrate-1.1.1.js
504 ms
script.js
543 ms
script.responsive.js
596 ms
font-awesome.min.css
441 ms
comment-reply.min.js
453 ms
ssba.min.js
497 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
13 ms
wp-slimstat.min.js
17 ms
script_2.1.2.js
498 ms
widgets.js
165 ms
button.facebook.js
498 ms
all.js
29 ms
in.js
12 ms
button.googleplus.js
496 ms
wp-embed.min.js
552 ms
e-201611.js
12 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
452 ms
header.jpg
211 ms
spacer.gif
251 ms
vmenuitemicon.png
271 ms
google.png
269 ms
twitter.png
270 ms
facebook.png
270 ms
Vergleichsportal.jpg
270 ms
vergleichsportal.jpg
537 ms
kfz-versicherung-vergleich.jpg
538 ms
private-krankenversicherung-vergleich.jpg
537 ms
gebaeudeversicherung-vergleich.jpg
535 ms
Fotolia_1330574_XS1-300x199.jpg
537 ms
Fotolia_44407339_XS-300x210.jpg
535 ms
Fotolia_3379231_S-300x202.jpg
630 ms
vWaBJIbaQuBNz02ALIKJ3A.ttf
139 ms
cNycqCSU8dNAVKEAWPvbqw.ttf
139 ms
10JVD_humAd5zP2yrFqw6onF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
139 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
148 ms
plusone.js
144 ms
366 ms
g.gif
294 ms
xd_arbiter.php
275 ms
xd_arbiter.php
298 ms
ping
363 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
61 ms
vergleichsportal.eu accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
vergleichsportal.eu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
vergleichsportal.eu SEO score
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vergleichsportal.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vergleichsportal.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vergleichsportal.eu
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vergleichsportal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: