Tools & Wizards About Us
vergleichsportale.expert screenshot

Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

vergleichsportale.expert

Vergleichsportale - Preisvergleich mit Vergleichsportal richtig nutzen

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

318 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

258 ms

vergleichsportale.expert screenshot

About Website

Visit vergleichsportale.expert now to see the best up-to-date Vergleichsportale content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vergleichsportale.expert

Die besten Vergleichsportale für Ihre Suche – objektiv✅ neutral✅ und informativ✅. Hier finden Sie gute Vergleichseiten für jeden Preisvergleich.

Visit vergleichsportale.expert

Key Findings

We analyzed Vergleichsportale.expert page load time and found that the first response time was 318 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vergleichsportale.expert performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

52/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vergleichsportale.expert

318 ms

vergleichsportale.expert

614 ms

font-f82bba6b503b7f61ebdb30e1fdaf809b.css

211 ms

style.css

324 ms

font-awesome.min.css

329 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Vergleichsportale.expert, 2% (1 request) were made to Badges.kaufberater.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (790 ms) belongs to the original domain Vergleichsportale.expert.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 95.1 kB (45%)

Content Size

211.6 kB

After Optimization

116.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Vergleichsportale.expert main page is 211.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 110.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 87.4 kB

  • Original 110.4 kB
  • After minification 109.5 kB
  • After compression 23.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 101.2 kB
  • After minification 93.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vergleichsportale images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (65%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vergleichsportale. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vergleichsportale.expert

vergleichsportale.expert

318 ms

vergleichsportale.expert

vergleichsportale.expert

614 ms

font-f82bba6b503b7f61ebdb30e1fdaf809b.css

font-f82bba6b503b7f61ebdb30e1fdaf809b.css

211 ms

style.css

style.css

324 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

329 ms

arconix-shortcodes.min.css

arconix-shortcodes.min.css

332 ms

font-e57ae46e24e3b8ac28222b121b775ffd.css

font-e57ae46e24e3b8ac28222b121b775ffd.css

326 ms

eae.min.css

eae.min.css

461 ms

peel.css

peel.css

327 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

431 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

441 ms

vegas.min.css

vegas.min.css

435 ms

easy-responsive-shortcodes.css

easy-responsive-shortcodes.css

433 ms

default.css

default.css

437 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

540 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

665 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

542 ms

post-8338.css

post-8338.css

543 ms

global.css

global.css

550 ms

style.css

style.css

576 ms

preset_styles.css

preset_styles.css

647 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

755 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

656 ms

ubermenu.min.css

ubermenu.min.css

660 ms

deepsky.css

deepsky.css

684 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

755 ms

custom_script.css

custom_script.css

760 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

768 ms

font-f0c90f852f7c98ccdb07535df81411dc.css

font-f0c90f852f7c98ccdb07535df81411dc.css

769 ms

tablepress-responsive.min.css

tablepress-responsive.min.css

790 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

776 ms

lcp-beacon.min.js

lcp-beacon.min.js

776 ms

mem8YaGs126MiZpBA-UFVZ0d.woff

mem8YaGs126MiZpBA-UFVZ0d.woff

129 ms

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN_r8OUuhv.woff

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN_r8OUuhv.woff

120 ms

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UNirkOUuhv.woff

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UNirkOUuhv.woff

128 ms

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN7rgOUuhv.woff

mem5YaGs126MiZpBA-UN7rgOUuhv.woff

107 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

262 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

357 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

437 ms

u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZK.woff

u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZK.woff

235 ms

shop

shop

39 ms

cropped-header.png

cropped-header.png

228 ms

Fotolia_38941281_XS-300x212.jpg

Fotolia_38941281_XS-300x212.jpg

230 ms

Preisvergleich-2.png

Preisvergleich-2.png

333 ms

geizhals.png

geizhals.png

335 ms

billiger-2.png

billiger-2.png

335 ms

preisvergleich.de-2-300x99.png

preisvergleich.de-2-300x99.png

364 ms

guenstiger.png

guenstiger.png

441 ms

check24.jpg

check24.jpg

441 ms

verivox.jpg

verivox.jpg

443 ms

Tarifcheck-104-x-34-klein-e1525197226467.png

Tarifcheck-104-x-34-klein-e1525197226467.png

457 ms

finanzen.de_.jpg

finanzen.de_.jpg

470 ms

tarifcheck.jpg

tarifcheck.jpg

538 ms

tabby-print.css

tabby-print.css

106 ms

Accessibility Review

vergleichsportale.expert accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

vergleichsportale.expert best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

vergleichsportale.expert SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vergleichsportale.expert can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vergleichsportale.expert main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vergleichsportale.expert

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vergleichsportale. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: