Tools & Wizards About Us
verifyi9.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

verifyi9.com

E-Verify Made Easy! No tutorials, no tests, no delays. Quick and easy. • Verifyi9

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

265 ms

Resources Loaded

925 ms

Page Rendered

221 ms

verifyi9.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to verifyi9.com homepage info - get ready to check Verifyi9 best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about verifyi9.com

We eliminate the headaches associated with setting up and managing E-Verify. Prompt, personal, professional service since 2007. We make E-Verify easy!

Visit verifyi9.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Verifyi9.com page load time and found that the first response time was 265 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

verifyi9.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

78/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.225

55/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

69/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

verifyi9.com

265 ms

verifyi9.com

129 ms

blocks.style.build.css

41 ms

video-container.min.css

43 ms

front.min.css

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Verifyi9.com, 12% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (354 ms) belongs to the original domain Verifyi9.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 81.7 kB (76%)

Content Size

108.2 kB

After Optimization

26.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Verifyi9.com main page is 108.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 100.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 81.7 kB

  • Original 100.1 kB
  • After minification 95.1 kB
  • After compression 18.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 8.0 kB
  • After minification 8.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Verifyi9 images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (92%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Verifyi9. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

verifyi9.com

verifyi9.com

265 ms

verifyi9.com

verifyi9.com

129 ms

blocks.style.build.css

blocks.style.build.css

41 ms

video-container.min.css

video-container.min.css

43 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

52 ms

unsemantic-grid.min.css

unsemantic-grid.min.css

50 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

60 ms

mobile.min.css

mobile.min.css

48 ms

font-icons.min.css

font-icons.min.css

72 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

76 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

82 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

89 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

90 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

96 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

115 ms

general.min.css

general.min.css

105 ms

eael-10868.css

eael-10868.css

113 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

129 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

133 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

126 ms

post-18666.css

post-18666.css

136 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

147 ms

global.css

global.css

165 ms

fadeIn.min.css

fadeIn.min.css

160 ms

widget-flip-box.min.css

widget-flip-box.min.css

174 ms

widget-call-to-action.min.css

widget-call-to-action.min.css

180 ms

post-10868.css

post-10868.css

163 ms

post-18675.css

post-18675.css

179 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

197 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

193 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

216 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

210 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

223 ms

style-mobile.min.css

style-mobile.min.css

227 ms

sticky.min.css

sticky.min.css

219 ms

navigation-branding.min.css

navigation-branding.min.css

238 ms

css

css

38 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

249 ms

js

js

67 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

251 ms

default-styles.css

default-styles.css

216 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

238 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

224 ms

sticky.min.js

sticky.min.js

354 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

352 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

342 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

332 ms

eael-10868.js

eael-10868.js

327 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

325 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

315 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

314 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

308 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

300 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

292 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

289 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

281 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

277 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

275 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

29 ms

css2

css2

16 ms

css2

css2

18 ms

verifyi9-logo2_transp_128x64.png

verifyi9-logo2_transp_128x64.png

101 ms

placeholder.svg

placeholder.svg

101 ms

everify_logo_220.png

everify_logo_220.png

100 ms

generatepress.woff

generatepress.woff

117 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

75 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

49 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

65 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

76 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

78 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

78 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

79 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

79 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

76 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

104 ms

lazyload.js

lazyload.js

95 ms

Accessibility Review

verifyi9.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

verifyi9.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

verifyi9.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Verifyi9.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Verifyi9.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

verifyi9.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Verifyi9. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: