3.5 sec in total
45 ms
3 sec
457 ms
Click here to check amazing Versacall content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about versacall.com
Our customers have realized a 10% to 12% reduction in production floor downtime. Improving productivity and production output. FREE DEMO
Visit versacall.comWe analyzed Versacall.com page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
versacall.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value10.0 s
0/100
25%
Value17.2 s
0/100
10%
Value4,340 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.208
60/100
15%
Value37.0 s
0/100
10%
45 ms
89 ms
70 ms
61 ms
104 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Versacall.com, 14% (14 requests) were made to Static.zohocdn.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (833 ms) relates to the external source Forms.zohopublic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 123.3 kB (8%)
1.6 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Versacall.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 662.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 87.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Versacall images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 19.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 13.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Versacall.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (79%)
87
18
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Versacall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 46 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
versacall.com
45 ms
www.versacall.com
89 ms
stat.js
70 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
61 ms
style.min.css
104 ms
classic-themes.min.css
70 ms
widgets-on-pages-public.css
119 ms
css
83 ms
normalize.css
77 ms
foundation.css
92 ms
canvas.css
131 ms
style.css
109 ms
font-awesome.min.css
71 ms
dashicons.min.css
120 ms
style.css
141 ms
upw-theme-standard.min.css
139 ms
pum-site-styles.css
139 ms
jquery.min.js
69 ms
global.js
154 ms
modernizr.js
152 ms
uikit.min.js
185 ms
accordion.js
190 ms
parallax.js
191 ms
t.js
74 ms
js
109 ms
js
154 ms
email-decode.min.js
140 ms
pa-6346a034405b1d0011001463.js
501 ms
zcga.js
434 ms
zf_gclid.js
433 ms
gaconnector.js
109 ms
font-awesome.min.css
215 ms
swiper-bundle.min.css
247 ms
logo-slider-wp-public.min.css
246 ms
foundation.min.js
349 ms
foundation.orbit.js
349 ms
api.js
79 ms
home.js
348 ms
core.min.js
348 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
348 ms
smush-lazy-load-native.min.js
348 ms
swiper-bundle.min.js
429 ms
logo-slider-wp-public.js
429 ms
swap.js
78 ms
css
19 ms
bat.js
174 ms
gtm.js
157 ms
versacall-logo-white-letters.png
171 ms
Assembly-Line-small.jpg
163 ms
lftracker_v1_bElvO73dQNK4ZMqj.js
437 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
39 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
73 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
84 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
85 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
18 ms
150000874.js
51 ms
150000874
79 ms
widget
414 ms
KCS5QNQwpQKwH3ZMsL4-qVBKjgIBWC6EdEd2VZAIA8E
833 ms
clarity.js
82 ms
recaptcha__en.js
88 ms
versa-vision.svg
78 ms
tr-rc.lfeeder.com
95 ms
website
453 ms
--Ba6dyKt_c
100 ms
www-player.css
7 ms
www-embed-player.js
28 ms
base.js
53 ms
ad_status.js
272 ms
xmnuRLFIB2aI6qbGS483SdTuOq1a1O-XNl-4_rBMxeo.js
121 ms
embed.js
82 ms
formsthirdparty.2755260429cd02c98112dac6f4b5b8ce.css
308 ms
formslive.73420f63009cad08be2229514d0c2b7f.css
368 ms
fonts
195 ms
ocean.d511f274e020f3a8eb16ddc43bdeb0a5.css
308 ms
media.dd451096fb471a1d5ade10d2619ff8ee.css
311 ms
oceanMedia.4e1b937ce38ad6ffb3d07c8fe6b66133.css
318 ms
formstplivejs.5598e1e583c1d09fc270b76b7bc87fed.js
318 ms
formsthirdpartylivejs.62943a8ee9919d8253e7be70bab3de1c.js
319 ms
formscommonlive.b337cfdc246bbb1b8a646ab9091d7c7d.js
320 ms
formslive.24a7ccae42a60a77cc3b13136374025d.js
434 ms
formsselect.b9384dcadf2bc7b3816527891df599f6.js
380 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
170 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
170 ms
floatbutton1_0uA5KIDjSJBNGPeiRDI3YtNcjWJ9mZsPq48NM5iMzp7_jWYVkIHbMtgrDX_xil60_.css
268 ms
floatbutton1_gagAduz5tiLSaBz7XRSC6p-M4kbireaUx12UCBqdoxV8brFf-iczAg0VKg-2ght8_.js
313 ms
id
27 ms
Create
28 ms
GenerateIT
14 ms
showcaptcha
306 ms
warning-info.607d397302b1f344f8d8df1258004046.png
33 ms
loader.79de1b954774690fff0e7345d82faa25.gif
33 ms
check-mark-outline.e44509047a0a79fb604be98bb10ec5bc.png
33 ms
pngSpritelive.8d6bfb1b46f23ca5030982c48f63f51c.png
49 ms
siq_mpWsf52LIPg9mU40fjRdjF6WMUs-Q0VNu4KH07GkhNZGQTRxW2eRyFJLAq9VKCYB_.ttf
47 ms
roundtrip.js
18 ms
c.gif
8 ms
versacall.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
versacall.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
versacall.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Versacall.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Versacall.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
versacall.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Versacall. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: