5.3 sec in total
280 ms
5 sec
75 ms
Click here to check amazing Versadock content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about versadock.com
Home -
Visit versadock.comWe analyzed Versadock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 280 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
versadock.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value7.7 s
24/100
10%
Value310 ms
77/100
30%
Value0.03
100/100
15%
Value9.3 s
31/100
10%
280 ms
523 ms
80 ms
237 ms
232 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Versadock.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Versadock.com.
Page size can be reduced by 186.0 kB (5%)
3.8 MB
3.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Versadock.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 110.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 75.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Versadock images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 0 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (69%)
77
24
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Versadock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
versadock.com
280 ms
www.versadock.com
523 ms
reset.css
80 ms
app.css
237 ms
backtotop.css
232 ms
js
83 ms
style.min.css
310 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
234 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
235 ms
views-frontend.css
235 ms
shortcodes.css
308 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
313 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
314 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
316 ms
woocommerce.css
318 ms
style.min.css
386 ms
style_en.css
465 ms
dashicons.min.css
478 ms
genericons.css
479 ms
font-awesome.min.css
393 ms
all.min.css
396 ms
all.min.css
540 ms
style.css
480 ms
default.css
481 ms
ytprefs.min.css
547 ms
toolset-common-es-frontend.js
558 ms
language-cookie.js
567 ms
jquery.min.js
28 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
568 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
569 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
617 ms
js.cookie.min.js
619 ms
woocommerce.min.js
624 ms
ytprefs.min.js
628 ms
foundation.js
787 ms
app-min.js
720 ms
main.js
719 ms
jquery.fittext.js
720 ms
modernizr.min.js
39 ms
wc-blocks.css
719 ms
cookie-law-info-table.css
648 ms
rs6.css
545 ms
fontfaceobserver.standalone.js
546 ms
slick.js
551 ms
slick-lightbox.min.js
553 ms
rbtools.min.js
632 ms
rs6.min.js
741 ms
cart_widget.min.js
623 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
622 ms
order-attribution.min.js
623 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
620 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
599 ms
fitvids.min.js
590 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
587 ms
maxmegamenu.js
509 ms
public.js
572 ms
versadock-background-pattern.svg
392 ms
versadock-header-logo-01.svg
393 ms
versadock320rev.png
394 ms
en.png
394 ms
VERSADOCK-DRIVE-ON-DOCK-MENU-IMAGE-500X500-2.png
657 ms
VERSADOCK-PONTOONS-AND-JETTIES-MENU.jpg
511 ms
VERSADOCK-RAFTS-2.jpg
674 ms
VERSADOCK-WORKING-AND-EVENT-PLATFORMS-.jpg
750 ms
VERSADOCK-DrySail-%E2%80%93-V2-MENU-IMAGE-500X500-copy.png
751 ms
VERSADOCK-AIR-MENU-IMAGE-500X500.png
601 ms
VERSADOCK-DOCK-BOX-MENU.jpg
589 ms
versadock-custom-swim-platform.jpg
672 ms
versadock-custom-floating-docks-and-pontoons-Red-Bull-Flugtag-2.jpg
682 ms
VERSADOCK-FLOATING-PONTOON-FLOATS-AND-CONNECTORES-1.jpg
673 ms
MENU-VERSADOCK-FLOATING-PONTOON-MOORING.jpg
695 ms
WINCHES-VERSADOCK-MODULAR-FLOATING-PONTOON.jpg
693 ms
SAFETY-VERSADOCK-FLOATING-PONTOON.jpg
701 ms
ACCESSORIES-VERSADOCK-FLOATING-PONTOON.jpg
750 ms
2a34f1f8-d701-4949-b12d-133c1c2636eb.woff
3263 ms
wARDj0u
1 ms
08edde9d-c27b-4731-a27f-d6cd9b01cd06.woff
3247 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
800 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
712 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
727 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
773 ms
fa-v4compatibility.ttf
669 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
669 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
699 ms
dummy.png
717 ms
quality-marks-03.png
723 ms
logo-cookieyes.svg
721 ms
cd-top-arrow.svg
732 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
80 ms
versadock.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
versadock.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
versadock.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Versadock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Versadock.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
versadock.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Versadock. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: