9.9 sec in total
965 ms
8.3 sec
617 ms
Welcome to versionnext.com homepage info - get ready to check Version Next best content right away, or after learning these important things about versionnext.com
Looking for result-oriented design, print, website development and digital marketing services under a budget? Look no further! Hire us and build a strong digital presence for your brand.
Visit versionnext.comWe analyzed Versionnext.com page load time and found that the first response time was 965 ms and then it took 8.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
versionnext.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
14/100
10%
Value32.0 s
0/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value560 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value16.6 s
5/100
10%
965 ms
19 ms
744 ms
510 ms
516 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Versionnext.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Versionnext.com.
Page size can be reduced by 770.2 kB (11%)
7.3 MB
6.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Versionnext.com main page is 7.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 6.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.5 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 427.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Version Next images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 187.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 187.0 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 114.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Versionnext.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 114.4 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (44%)
62
35
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Version Next. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
versionnext.com
965 ms
bootstrap.min.css
19 ms
font-awesome.min.css
744 ms
nivo-lightbox.css
510 ms
default.css
516 ms
animate.css
1013 ms
style.css
770 ms
component.css
705 ms
js
65 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
12 ms
bootstrap.min.js
30 ms
WebResource.axd
969 ms
WebResource.axd
990 ms
jquery.min.js
777 ms
bootstrap.min.js
526 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
600 ms
classie.js
756 ms
gnmenu.js
757 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
768 ms
nivo-lightbox.min.js
804 ms
stellar.js
814 ms
custom.js
995 ms
TweenLite.min.js
1003 ms
EasePack.min.js
1010 ms
rAF.js
1015 ms
demo-1.js
1049 ms
api.js
38 ms
css
19 ms
js
108 ms
analytics.js
87 ms
WidgetScript
86 ms
logogry.png
523 ms
GoogleReviews.png
1817 ms
1.jpg
1815 ms
3.jpg
3308 ms
4.jpg
2114 ms
2.jpg
2896 ms
5.jpg
1500 ms
Corporate_Identity.jpg
1768 ms
marketing_collateral_main.jpg
2018 ms
Retail_Merchandising.jpg
2059 ms
outdoor_media_bottom.jpg
2300 ms
PackagingDesign.jpg
2267 ms
web.jpg
2305 ms
Rebranding1.jpg
2371 ms
Brand_Consultancy.jpg
2548 ms
1-work.jpg
2790 ms
2-work.jpg
2570 ms
3-work.jpg
2612 ms
4-work.jpg
2796 ms
5-work.jpg
2799 ms
6-work.jpg
2851 ms
7-work.jpg
3023 ms
8-work.jpg
3046 ms
chirag.jpg
3027 ms
linear.jpg
3025 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff
19 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff
19 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
19 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
20 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff
21 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
20 ms
collect
47 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
3018 ms
ecoicons.woff
3088 ms
marshalls.jpg
3090 ms
navkar_international.jpg
3092 ms
nova.jpg
3111 ms
CaptchaImage.axd
3246 ms
galaxy-wallpaper.jpg
6314 ms
milky_way1.jpg
3104 ms
animationback1.gif
3136 ms
versionnext.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
versionnext.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
versionnext.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Versionnext.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Versionnext.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
versionnext.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Version Next. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: