Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

vertigo24.it

Vertigo24.it

Page Load Speed

925 ms in total

First Response

22 ms

Resources Loaded

832 ms

Page Rendered

71 ms

vertigo24.it screenshot

About Website

Welcome to vertigo24.it homepage info - get ready to check Vertigo24 best content right away, or after learning these important things about vertigo24.it

Visit vertigo24.it

Key Findings

We analyzed Vertigo24.it page load time and found that the first response time was 22 ms and then it took 903 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vertigo24.it performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ww6.vertigo24.it

22 ms

bXgiQnFPg.js

4 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Vertigo24.it and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (22 ms) relates to the external source Ww6.vertigo24.it.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 72.5 kB (32%)

Content Size

226.6 kB

After Optimization

154.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Vertigo24.it main page is 226.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 141.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 288 B

  • Original 1.1 kB
  • After minification 1.0 kB
  • After compression 763 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 288 B or 27% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 141.7 kB
  • After minification 131.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vertigo24 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 61.6 kB

  • Original 83.8 kB
  • After minification 83.7 kB
  • After compression 22.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vertigo24. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

vertigo24.it accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vertigo24.it best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

vertigo24.it SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vertigo24.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Vertigo24.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vertigo24. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: