Tools & Wizards About Us
vev.by screenshot

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

vev.by

Строительный портал - vev.by

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

615 ms

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

vev.by screenshot

About Website

Visit vev.by now to see the best up-to-date Vev content for Ukraine and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vev.by

Все о строительстве на vev.by

Visit vev.by

Key Findings

We analyzed Vev.by page load time and found that the first response time was 615 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vev.by performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

79/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vev.by

615 ms

vev.by

3194 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

635 ms

typed.js

478 ms

style.css

480 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Vev.by, 5% (2 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Vev.by.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 308.8 kB (50%)

Content Size

614.2 kB

After Optimization

305.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vev.by main page is 614.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 378.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 85.4 kB

  • Original 103.0 kB
  • After minification 93.9 kB
  • After compression 17.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 83.3 kB
  • After minification 83.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vev images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 181.8 kB

  • Original 378.0 kB
  • After minification 378.0 kB
  • After compression 196.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 181.8 kB or 48% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 41.6 kB

  • Original 49.9 kB
  • After minification 10.1 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vev.by needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (77%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vev. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vev.by

vev.by

615 ms

vev.by

vev.by

3194 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

635 ms

typed.js

typed.js

478 ms

style.css

style.css

480 ms

styles.css

styles.css

481 ms

uikit-css-min.css

uikit-css-min.css

650 ms

custom.css

custom.css

646 ms

flipdown-min.css

flipdown-min.css

647 ms

swiper-bundle-min.css

swiper-bundle-min.css

648 ms

placeholder.svg

placeholder.svg

166 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

161 ms

fon-gl.jpg

fon-gl.jpg

481 ms

fon-gl-mini.jpg

fon-gl-mini.jpg

166 ms

shopping-cart-solid.svg

shopping-cart-solid.svg

164 ms

trophy-solid.svg

trophy-solid.svg

320 ms

hard-hat-solid.svg

hard-hat-solid.svg

322 ms

arrow-up-right-dots-solid.svg

arrow-up-right-dots-solid.svg

323 ms

icon-banner.svg

icon-banner.svg

326 ms

proximanova-light.woff

proximanova-light.woff

568 ms

proximanova-semibold.woff

proximanova-semibold.woff

727 ms

icon-master-card.svg

icon-master-card.svg

160 ms

icon-footer-visa.svg

icon-footer-visa.svg

162 ms

mir.svg

mir.svg

160 ms

wp-polyfill-fetch-min.js

wp-polyfill-fetch-min.js

162 ms

wp-polyfill-dom-rect-min.js

wp-polyfill-dom-rect-min.js

164 ms

wp-polyfill-url-min.js

wp-polyfill-url-min.js

160 ms

wp-polyfill-formdata-min.js

wp-polyfill-formdata-min.js

314 ms

wp-polyfill-element-closest-min.js

wp-polyfill-element-closest-min.js

316 ms

wp-polyfill-object-fit-min.js

wp-polyfill-object-fit-min.js

317 ms

index.js

index.js

344 ms

jquery-maskedinput.js

jquery-maskedinput.js

345 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

346 ms

barba-min.js

barba-min.js

476 ms

inputmask-min.js

inputmask-min.js

629 ms

uikit-icons-min.js

uikit-icons-min.js

643 ms

uikit-min.js

uikit-min.js

634 ms

wp-embed-min.js

wp-embed-min.js

486 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

657 ms

script.js

script.js

634 ms

blk.js

blk.js

656 ms

main.js

main.js

789 ms

hit

hit

553 ms

hit

hit

129 ms

Accessibility Review

vev.by accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

vev.by best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

vev.by SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vev.by can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vev.by main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vev.by

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vev. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: