4.3 sec in total
38 ms
2.2 sec
2.1 sec
Welcome to vev.design homepage info - get ready to check Vev best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about vev.design
Launch interactive content and build impactful marketing materials effortlessly. with Vev. Trusted by brands like Experian and Pfizer.
Visit vev.designWe analyzed Vev.design page load time and found that the first response time was 38 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
vev.design performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
11/100
10%
Value26.9 s
0/100
25%
Value20.5 s
0/100
10%
Value22,360 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value41.2 s
0/100
10%
38 ms
103 ms
38 ms
116 ms
78 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Vev.design, 90% (78 requests) were made to Cdn.vev.design and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.iubenda.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.vev.design.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (23%)
8.3 MB
6.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Vev.design main page is 8.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 1.8 MB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 140.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vev images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (10%)
67
60
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vev. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
vev.design
38 ms
www.vev.design
103 ms
2317380.js
38 ms
stub.js
116 ms
iubenda_cs.js
78 ms
42655eb3fd316bb4880b8d8fa9e7e5a1.js
288 ms
vev.js
205 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
39 ms
QdAAasrZhdk_2100.jpg
50 ms
xy4NGo6gvj.png
99 ms
HnYQ-tagOg.png
100 ms
YHhZBgKBWL.png
100 ms
8ekS-hsun6.png
98 ms
_nh4g5_SSE.png
102 ms
595j7VVoxl.svg
100 ms
uxOvq0HCXO.png
103 ms
2-weqHdy9P.png
102 ms
MtcO428PYQ.png
102 ms
qrvAO70sP-.png
106 ms
PnffCMTDks.png
105 ms
9f5OoGSIfR.png
107 ms
R2NxqjZ0CY.svg
104 ms
jl_RHk1T-p.png
108 ms
nfKH90u2Ob.png
109 ms
KyqgMcEEHg.png
112 ms
f_fa44kKBE.png
113 ms
KoWzlvj6Tk.png
124 ms
8oFS2u3tJi.png
140 ms
OnBybjODqC.png
120 ms
uPJ8f1ZaIu.png
146 ms
SGISD3-C3L.png
149 ms
HR47qjI_ok.png
151 ms
SHqrHKma9p.svg
147 ms
ylUyhq0Xep.png
639 ms
ow5MFEPNmN.png
509 ms
ToK0w9igDq.png
176 ms
-uAGFqkgmZ.png
172 ms
Za1HExy3wS.png
169 ms
4OqFtvI8my.png
360 ms
Vaog0LXDKH.svg
183 ms
aBpZoWplMY.svg
195 ms
BhNE9xh9_5.png
227 ms
_YEHtKq1kH.svg
198 ms
2tSOYhFCEL.png
264 ms
cf2JeGW3nI.png
249 ms
6Wl_DqotNj.svg
149 ms
hgCokgbqeR.png
176 ms
3ewHZskDBK.png
200 ms
6DTEvY50bq.png
222 ms
AXCXv30Vud.png
228 ms
qwUUhMyG8a.png
246 ms
2yLDJqNCVm.png
253 ms
-uFbks-Jnw.png
265 ms
BWDNXCaffN.png
268 ms
LvTtVcusDE.png
275 ms
wcDwZkoXFD.png
764 ms
Aeonik-Regular.woff
430 ms
Aeonik-Medium.woff
455 ms
Aeonik-Light.woff
554 ms
AeonikProTRIAL-Light.woff
572 ms
Aeonik-Air.woff
582 ms
Aeonik-Thin.woff
644 ms
AeonikProTRIAL-Bold.woff
676 ms
analytics.min.js
283 ms
Aeonik-Bold.woff
875 ms
Aeonik-Black.woff
679 ms
Iskry-Regular.woff
743 ms
main.js
9 ms
Aeonik-Regular.woff
783 ms
Aeonik-Medium.woff
1059 ms
Aeonik-Light.woff
821 ms
Aeonik-Thin.woff
826 ms
Aeonik-Air.woff
918 ms
Aeonik-Bold.woff
976 ms
Aeonik-Black.woff
998 ms
Aeonik-Regular.woff
1031 ms
oq2WOgySksM
1610 ms
oSZzkAqIRIM
1690 ms
Or71hVsIzsc
935 ms
V2LvMWtMkLA
1367 ms
dEAcE-KZGV8
908 ms
qMh_Qmg1Vr.png
922 ms
bVmS3Ns9Fp.png
907 ms
wgbcQ6UfW1.png
919 ms
7mwpwrHh5p.png
904 ms
ifysXT8acH.png
902 ms
mp0umN_6b2.png
909 ms
vev.design accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
vev.design best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
vev.design SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vev.design can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vev.design main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vev.design
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vev. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: