Tools & Wizards About Us
vfrmap.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

vfrmap.com

VFRMAP - Digital Aeronautical Charts

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

234 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

220 ms

vfrmap.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing VFRMAP content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vfrmap.com

Online VFR and IFR aeronautical charts, Digital Airport / Facility Directory (AFD)

Visit vfrmap.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vfrmap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 234 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vfrmap.com performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vfrmap.com

234 ms

map.css

67 ms

js

48 ms

map.js

131 ms

search.png

68 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Vfrmap.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 7% (7 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Vfrmap.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 335.8 kB (14%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vfrmap.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 34.5 kB

  • Original 39.2 kB
  • After minification 38.8 kB
  • After compression 4.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. VFRMAP images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 296.9 kB

  • Original 441.3 kB
  • After minification 441.3 kB
  • After compression 144.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 296.9 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 866 B

  • Original 1.6 kB
  • After minification 1.6 kB
  • After compression 724 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vfrmap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 866 B or 54% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (7%)

Requests Now

90

After Optimization

84

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of VFRMAP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vfrmap.com

vfrmap.com

234 ms

map.css

map.css

67 ms

js

js

48 ms

map.js

map.js

131 ms

search.png

search.png

68 ms

fe

fe

111 ms

common.js

common.js

23 ms

map.js

map.js

17 ms

util.js

util.js

19 ms

onion.js

onion.js

17 ms

openhand_8_8.cur

openhand_8_8.cur

52 ms

controls.js

controls.js

38 ms

156.jpg

156.jpg

133 ms

155.jpg

155.jpg

136 ms

156.jpg

156.jpg

204 ms

156.jpg

156.jpg

144 ms

157.jpg

157.jpg

206 ms

155.jpg

155.jpg

205 ms

155.jpg

155.jpg

197 ms

157.jpg

157.jpg

269 ms

157.jpg

157.jpg

273 ms

154.jpg

154.jpg

264 ms

156.jpg

156.jpg

269 ms

156.jpg

156.jpg

286 ms

158.jpg

158.jpg

355 ms

154.jpg

154.jpg

330 ms

154.jpg

154.jpg

336 ms

155.jpg

155.jpg

339 ms

155.jpg

155.jpg

344 ms

157.jpg

157.jpg

419 ms

157.jpg

157.jpg

404 ms

158.jpg

158.jpg

472 ms

158.jpg

158.jpg

488 ms

154.jpg

154.jpg

424 ms

154.jpg

154.jpg

424 ms

158.jpg

158.jpg

540 ms

158.jpg

158.jpg

486 ms

153.jpg

153.jpg

491 ms

159.jpg

159.jpg

561 ms

153.jpg

153.jpg

538 ms

153.jpg

153.jpg

554 ms

159.jpg

159.jpg

558 ms

159.jpg

159.jpg

627 ms

153.jpg

153.jpg

605 ms

153.jpg

153.jpg

605 ms

159.jpg

159.jpg

689 ms

159.jpg

159.jpg

691 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

46 ms

css

css

36 ms

300.jpg

300.jpg

654 ms

google4.png

google4.png

28 ms

mapcnt6.png

mapcnt6.png

34 ms

sv5.png

sv5.png

32 ms

tmapctrl.png

tmapctrl.png

24 ms

tmapctrl4.png

tmapctrl4.png

52 ms

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff

25 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

35 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

51 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff

52 ms

299.jpg

299.jpg

1152 ms

300.jpg

300.jpg

1163 ms

300.jpg

300.jpg

1145 ms

301.jpg

301.jpg

1100 ms

299.jpg

299.jpg

1091 ms

299.jpg

299.jpg

1082 ms

301.jpg

301.jpg

1212 ms

301.jpg

301.jpg

1156 ms

298.jpg

298.jpg

1162 ms

300.jpg

300.jpg

1158 ms

300.jpg

300.jpg

1158 ms

302.jpg

302.jpg

1147 ms

fe

fe

1221 ms

298.jpg

298.jpg

1216 ms

298.jpg

298.jpg

1235 ms

299.jpg

299.jpg

1230 ms

299.jpg

299.jpg

1220 ms

301.jpg

301.jpg

1959 ms

301.jpg

301.jpg

1870 ms

302.jpg

302.jpg

1934 ms

302.jpg

302.jpg

1867 ms

298.jpg

298.jpg

1823 ms

298.jpg

298.jpg

1871 ms

302.jpg

302.jpg

1935 ms

302.jpg

302.jpg

1938 ms

297.jpg

297.jpg

1891 ms

303.jpg

303.jpg

1887 ms

297.jpg

297.jpg

1941 ms

297.jpg

297.jpg

1939 ms

303.jpg

303.jpg

1995 ms

303.jpg

303.jpg

1887 ms

297.jpg

297.jpg

1958 ms

297.jpg

297.jpg

2003 ms

303.jpg

303.jpg

1943 ms

303.jpg

303.jpg

1878 ms

overlay.js

overlay.js

10 ms

marker_blue.png

marker_blue.png

994 ms

Accessibility Review

vfrmap.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vfrmap.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

vfrmap.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vfrmap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vfrmap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vfrmap.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of VFRMAP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: