26.5 sec in total
11.5 sec
14.4 sec
634 ms
Visit vhcp.org now to see the best up-to-date Vhcp content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vhcp.org
Home care services for all ages, persons with disabilities, aging seniors, and medically fragile individuals with no minimum service hours required.
Visit vhcp.orgWe analyzed Vhcp.org page load time and found that the first response time was 11.5 sec and then it took 15 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
vhcp.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
51/100
10%
Value9.5 s
0/100
25%
Value5.9 s
47/100
10%
Value560 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.348
32/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
11482 ms
492 ms
334 ms
371 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Vhcp.org, 76% (66 requests) were made to Virginiahomecarepartners.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (11.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Vhcp.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (60%)
2.0 MB
825.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Vhcp.org main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 714.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 160.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 160.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 60.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Vhcp needs image optimization as it can save up to 60.2 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 426.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 426.1 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 566.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vhcp.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 566.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 64 (76%)
84
20
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vhcp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vhcp.org
11482 ms
bootstrap.css
492 ms
responsive.css
334 ms
camera.css
371 ms
font-awesome.min.css
24 ms
style.css
242 ms
formidablepro.css
620 ms
flexslider.css
309 ms
owl.carousel.css
308 ms
owl.theme.css
451 ms
font-awesome.css
257 ms
cherry-plugin.css
516 ms
lazy-load.css
511 ms
parallax.css
457 ms
testimonial-rotator-style.css
439 ms
main-style.css
587 ms
magnific-popup.css
544 ms
css
25 ms
addtoany.min.css
557 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
678 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
574 ms
jquery.elastislide.js
604 ms
js
42 ms
jquery.cycletwo.js
850 ms
jquery.cycletwo.addons.js
663 ms
nsu.js
660 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
690 ms
swfobject.js
789 ms
modernizr.js
821 ms
jflickrfeed.js
796 ms
custom.js
793 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1268 ms
jquery.mobile.customized.min.js
889 ms
box-shortcodes.css
722 ms
other-shortcodes.css
717 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
753 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
676 ms
cherry-plugin.js
772 ms
cherry.lazy-load.js
804 ms
device.min.js
844 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
962 ms
jquery.simplr.smoothscroll.min.js
965 ms
cherry.parallax.js
902 ms
superfish.js
916 ms
jquery.mobilemenu.js
894 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
985 ms
jplayer.playlist.min.js
913 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
965 ms
tmstickup.js
894 ms
device.min.js
841 ms
jquery.zaccordion.min.js
937 ms
camera.min.js
982 ms
jquery.debouncedresize.js
889 ms
jquery.ba-resize.min.js
888 ms
jquery.isotope.js
860 ms
css
14 ms
css
27 ms
style.css
882 ms
wp-embed.min.js
958 ms
jquery.bxslider.js
1205 ms
bxslider.setup.js
1152 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1142 ms
style.css
163 ms
analytics.js
167 ms
logo-web.png
895 ms
green-bar2.jpg
691 ms
loading1.gif
690 ms
slides-1.jpg
793 ms
slides-21.jpg
1110 ms
slides-3.jpg
1113 ms
slides-43.jpg
1112 ms
Personal-Care.jpg
915 ms
pic4.jpg
1357 ms
pic3.jpg
1363 ms
home-2-300x194.jpg
687 ms
icon-green-guy.png
687 ms
icon-blue-guy.png
688 ms
hp_bottom_content_mom_daughter.jpg
687 ms
collect
84 ms
arrows.simple.png
638 ms
page.js
597 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
554 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
555 ms
sm13.html
45 ms
icons.15.svg.css
83 ms
ga.js
20 ms
__utm.gif
51 ms
vhcp.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
vhcp.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
vhcp.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vhcp.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vhcp.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vhcp.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vhcp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: