2.8 sec in total
116 ms
1.9 sec
812 ms
Click here to check amazing Vi Control content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vi-control.net
Visit vi-control.netWe analyzed Vi-control.net page load time and found that the first response time was 116 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
vi-control.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value3.7 s
59/100
25%
Value5.1 s
62/100
10%
Value1,350 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.118
85/100
15%
Value12.1 s
16/100
10%
116 ms
163 ms
36 ms
119 ms
51 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Vi-control.net, 3% (3 requests) were made to Widget.sndcdn.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (900 ms) relates to the external source W.soundcloud.com.
Page size can be reduced by 3.0 MB (30%)
10.0 MB
7.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Vi-control.net main page is 10.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 643.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vi Control images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.6 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 703.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vi-control.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 703.8 kB or 66% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (32%)
88
60
The browser has sent 88 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vi Control. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vi-control.net
116 ms
vi-control.net
163 ms
portal
36 ms
119 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
51 ms
style.css
85 ms
gallery-default.css
109 ms
quick-paypal-payments.css
106 ms
jquery-ui.css
25 ms
font-awesome.min.css
108 ms
wonderplugin-tabs-engine.css
112 ms
dashicons.min.css
140 ms
css
38 ms
masterslider.main.css
120 ms
custom.css
142 ms
jquery.js
176 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
145 ms
wonderplugin-tabs-engine.js
146 ms
responsive-menu.js
154 ms
jscripts.php
175 ms
checkout.js
362 ms
quick-paypal-payments.js
166 ms
effect.min.js
165 ms
core.min.js
168 ms
datepicker.min.js
294 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
298 ms
masterslider.min.js
300 ms
jscripts-ftr-min.js
299 ms
wp-embed.min.js
298 ms
css
29 ms
900 ms
portal_bg_july9a.jpg
267 ms
blank.gif
122 ms
Help-Out-No-Words.jpg
286 ms
Birthday13.jpg
263 ms
IMG_1500.jpg
262 ms
Logic_Pro_X_screenshot-330x206.png
263 ms
vic_banner_468x180_VSB.gif
258 ms
2826402883.jpg
256 ms
538119773.jpg
258 ms
19374419.jpg
256 ms
2761214565.jpg
262 ms
2401345011.jpg
263 ms
286690937.jpg
263 ms
VI_468x180-1.gif
263 ms
25878115.jpeg
264 ms
PS_OceaniaAd_Portal_Aug2017.gif
440 ms
3040368257.jpg
306 ms
1411634158.jpg
305 ms
2CAudio_2017_BigSplash_468-180.gif
330 ms
vic_banner_468x180_STUDENT_.gif
306 ms
3338114597.jpg
305 ms
1372060484.jpg
340 ms
vgbanner1.gif
341 ms
3310805925.jpg
341 ms
1988496661.jpg
341 ms
4070137289.png
363 ms
2688936721.jpg
374 ms
883535339.png
378 ms
757552813.png
376 ms
2799319800.jpg
377 ms
1015759632.png
322 ms
UAnF6lSK1JNc1tqTiG8pNALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
26 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaI8DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
37 ms
631454343.jpg
330 ms
3800733310.png
330 ms
2755916887.jpg
330 ms
727058550.jpg
330 ms
PS_OceaniaAd_Portal_Aug2017-1.gif
425 ms
2697350975.jpeg
301 ms
1f609.svg
95 ms
3468252804.jpg
209 ms
3833624987.jpg
209 ms
498421996.jpg
209 ms
2908699614.jpg
225 ms
VI_LowdownV2_Portal.gif
222 ms
VirHarmonic_VIC.gif
257 ms
loading-2.gif
226 ms
bg-stripes.jpg
135 ms
subtitle.png
44 ms
title.png
69 ms
lines.png
41 ms
corner-badge1.png
53 ms
1_enter1.png
69 ms
2_forum1.png
52 ms
mixer1.png
69 ms
widget-3a997f5-776a62bf.js
83 ms
visual-single-sound-1b9af1c-e29cfa85.js
79 ms
ga.js
78 ms
avatars-000130448394-pvjw1y-t500x500.jpg
111 ms
beacon.js
62 ms
logo-200x120-a1591e.png
30 ms
QD+AP8BAAEBAQIBAwEEAQUBBgEHAQgBCQEKAQsBDAENAQ4BDwEQAREBEgEeARMBFAEVAAEAIQAWABcAGgAbABwAHQAfACMAKAApACoAKwAsAC0ALgAvADAAMQA0ADUANgCZAJoAmwCcAKwAswC0ALwAzQDRANIA2wABAAAAAQAIAAIASAAhABoAGwAcAB0AHwAjACgAKQAqACsALAAtAC4ALwAwADEANAA1ADYAmQCaAJsAnACsALMAtAC8ANEA0gDbABYAFwDNAAIAAgD4ARUAAAEcAR4AHgAA
6 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
__utm.gif
21 ms
vi-control.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
vi-control.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
vi-control.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vi-control.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vi-control.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vi-control.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vi Control. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: