Tools & Wizards About Us
viawebonline.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

viawebonline.com

Home - Best Web Design Company in Bangalore

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

249 ms

Resources Loaded

630 ms

Page Rendered

541 ms

viawebonline.com screenshot

About Website

Visit viawebonline.com now to see the best up-to-date Via Web Online content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about viawebonline.com

Techon - IT Solutions & Business Services Website Template

Visit viawebonline.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Viawebonline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 249 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

viawebonline.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value290 ms

80/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.77

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.9 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

viawebonline.com

249 ms

css2

37 ms

css2

53 ms

css2

59 ms

css2

58 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Viawebonline.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (249 ms) belongs to the original domain Viawebonline.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 35.2 kB (13%)

Content Size

273.2 kB

After Optimization

238.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Viawebonline.com main page is 273.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 128.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 23.2 kB

  • Original 27.5 kB
  • After minification 19.4 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.0 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 908 B

  • Original 47.8 kB
  • After minification 46.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Via Web Online images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 856 B

  • Original 128.5 kB
  • After minification 128.4 kB
  • After compression 127.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 69.4 kB
  • After minification 60.1 kB
  • After compression 59.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Viawebonline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (74%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Via Web Online. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

viawebonline.com

viawebonline.com

249 ms

css2

css2

37 ms

css2

css2

53 ms

css2

css2

59 ms

css2

css2

58 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

13 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

28 ms

icofont.min.css

icofont.min.css

23 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

26 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

21 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

29 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

29 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

33 ms

pages.css

pages.css

40 ms

style.css

style.css

37 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

34 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

28 ms

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

jquery-3.5.1.min.js

37 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

39 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

43 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

43 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

46 ms

validator.min.js

validator.min.js

44 ms

contact.js

contact.js

50 ms

main.js

main.js

52 ms

logo.png

logo.png

53 ms

slider-1.webp

slider-1.webp

57 ms

slider-3.webp

slider-3.webp

57 ms

slider-2.webp

slider-2.webp

65 ms

vndrshp.webp

vndrshp.webp

65 ms

chjac.webp

chjac.webp

66 ms

nazeera.webp

nazeera.webp

63 ms

moqtr.webp

moqtr.webp

68 ms

frsqr.webp

frsqr.webp

67 ms

akmi.webp

akmi.webp

72 ms

saggraha.webp

saggraha.webp

188 ms

odometer.min.css

odometer.min.css

44 ms

home-top-shape.html

home-top-shape.html

48 ms

footer-bg.jpg

footer-bg.jpg

10 ms

slider-1.webp

slider-1.webp

15 ms

slider-2.webp

slider-2.webp

10 ms

slider-2.webp

slider-2.webp

18 ms

slider-1.webp

slider-1.webp

19 ms

slider-3.webp

slider-3.webp

24 ms

JTUSjIg69CK48gW7PXooxW4.ttf

JTUSjIg69CK48gW7PXooxW4.ttf

19 ms

icofont.woff

icofont.woff

172 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

119 ms

Accessibility Review

viawebonline.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

viawebonline.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

viawebonline.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ZX

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Viawebonline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Viawebonline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

viawebonline.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Via Web Online. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: