Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

Page Load Speed

387 ms in total

First Response

63 ms

Resources Loaded

242 ms

Page Rendered

82 ms

videoequipment.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Videoequipment content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about videoequipment.com

Visit videoequipment.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Videoequipment.com page load time and found that the first response time was 63 ms and then it took 324 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

videoequipment.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

videoequipment.com

63 ms

www.moneyquestions.com

123 ms

styles.css

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Videoequipment.com, 67% (2 requests) were made to Moneyquestions.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (123 ms) relates to the external source Moneyquestions.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 525.1 kB (48%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

566.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Videoequipment.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 466.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 120 B

  • Original 343 B
  • After minification 320 B
  • After compression 223 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120 B or 35% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 7.9 kB

  • Original 362.0 kB
  • After minification 354.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Videoequipment images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 301.3 kB

  • Original 466.8 kB
  • After minification 450.5 kB
  • After compression 165.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 301.3 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 215.9 kB

  • Original 262.5 kB
  • After minification 262.2 kB
  • After compression 46.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Videoequipment.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 215.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Videoequipment. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

videoequipment.com accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

videoequipment.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

videoequipment.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videoequipment.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Videoequipment.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Videoequipment. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: