Tools & Wizards About Us
videogo.technology screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 55

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

videogo.technology

Video App at Videogo.technology - videogo.technology

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

225 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

81 ms

videogo.technology screenshot

About Website

Visit videogo.technology now to see the best up-to-date Videogo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about videogo.technology

Click here for the best Video App on the market from VideoGo, making video sharing fast and fun. Bringing broadcast quality to your video productions.

Visit videogo.technology

Key Findings

We analyzed Videogo.technology page load time and found that the first response time was 225 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

videogo.technology performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.025

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

videogo.technology

225 ms

index

980 ms

gtm.js

65 ms

general-39087d86d41d.css

471 ms

dompark-e32e409c0603.css

420 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Videogo.technology, 33% (7 requests) were made to Lcn.com and 29% (6 requests) were made to Wwws2.lcn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (980 ms) relates to the external source Lcn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 kB (2%)

Content Size

76.1 kB

After Optimization

74.3 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Videogo.technology main page is 76.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 59.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 203 B

  • Original 518 B
  • After minification 500 B
  • After compression 315 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 203 B or 39% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 59.1 kB
  • After minification 59.1 kB
  • After compression 57.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 16.4 kB
  • After minification 16.4 kB
  • After compression 16.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Videogo.technology has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (31%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Videogo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

videogo.technology

videogo.technology

225 ms

index

index

980 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

65 ms

general-39087d86d41d.css

general-39087d86d41d.css

471 ms

dompark-e32e409c0603.css

dompark-e32e409c0603.css

420 ms

skeletor.js

skeletor.js

526 ms

jquery-3.6.0-b82d238d4e31.js

jquery-3.6.0-b82d238d4e31.js

539 ms

shared-plugins-lcn-246ca3289b8c.js

shared-plugins-lcn-246ca3289b8c.js

524 ms

scripts-1a5e9bd22b8d.js

scripts-1a5e9bd22b8d.js

469 ms

embedded-overlay-660fd71b4c06.js

embedded-overlay-660fd71b4c06.js

480 ms

lcn-logo-25079744b7fe.svg

lcn-logo-25079744b7fe.svg

85 ms

couk-9a638783133f.svg

couk-9a638783133f.svg

248 ms

uk-ce4193e83ac9.svg

uk-ce4193e83ac9.svg

246 ms

com-alt-d2ef9b792fd9.svg

com-alt-d2ef9b792fd9.svg

250 ms

online-39e2ea191774.svg

online-39e2ea191774.svg

331 ms

flawless-on-every-device-e54deb3e480d.svg

flawless-on-every-device-e54deb3e480d.svg

333 ms

beautiful-design-9ab737549720.svg

beautiful-design-9ab737549720.svg

259 ms

SourceSansPro-Regular-91f931e6f939.woff

SourceSansPro-Regular-91f931e6f939.woff

328 ms

SourceSansPro-SemiBold-aa49813df53e.woff

SourceSansPro-SemiBold-aa49813df53e.woff

328 ms

GothamRounded-Medium-9439b9a40676.woff

GothamRounded-Medium-9439b9a40676.woff

317 ms

fontawesome-webfont-28b782240b3e.woff

fontawesome-webfont-28b782240b3e.woff

487 ms

Accessibility Review

videogo.technology accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

videogo.technology best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

videogo.technology SEO score

55

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videogo.technology can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Videogo.technology main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

videogo.technology

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Videogo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: