4.5 sec in total
212 ms
3.8 sec
537 ms
Click here to check amazing Videograaf content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about videograaf.eu
Als in een droom gaat jullie dag voorbij. Gelukkig vang ik als videograaf de mooiste beelden op en maak hiervan een schitterende trouwfilm!
Visit videograaf.euWe analyzed Videograaf.eu page load time and found that the first response time was 212 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
videograaf.eu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.9 s
0/100
10%
Value12.9 s
0/100
25%
Value25.5 s
0/100
10%
Value510 ms
57/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.1 s
6/100
10%
212 ms
746 ms
250 ms
578 ms
333 ms
Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Videograaf.eu and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (746 ms) belongs to the original domain Videograaf.eu.
Page size can be reduced by 697.9 kB (60%)
1.2 MB
465.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Videograaf.eu main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 544.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 104.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Videograaf images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 374.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 374.5 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 216.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Videograaf.eu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 216.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
18
18
The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Videograaf. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
videograaf.eu
212 ms
www.videograaf.eu
746 ms
default.include.d7bd2e.css
250 ms
default.include.f26a78.js
578 ms
font-awesome.min.css
333 ms
jwplayer.js
682 ms
greyzz.png
206 ms
videograaf-assem-producties-logo.png
204 ms
professionele-trouwfilm-bruiloft-brain-anne-wijchen-noord-brabant-360x202.jpg
207 ms
digitaal-trouwalbum-a-beautiful-day-360x202.jpg
208 ms
digitaal-geboortekaartje-newborn-kleine-muis-360x202.jpg
206 ms
videograaf-assem-producties-logo-m.png
207 ms
select_arrow_down.png
89 ms
slider-trouwfilm-andre-arja-wekerom-harskamp-doorwerth-barneveld-gelderland-1280x400.jpg
318 ms
slider-baby-filmster-stralend-gelderland-1280x400.jpg
222 ms
slider-videograaf-video-muzieknummer-1280x400.jpg
284 ms
preloader-white.gif
86 ms
professionele-trouwfilm-bruiloft-brain-anne-wijchen-noord-brabant-720x405.jpg
441 ms
digitaal-trouwalbum-a-beautiful-day-720x405.jpg
278 ms
digitaal-geboortekaartje-newborn-kleine-muis-720x405.jpg
437 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
382 ms
videograaf.eu accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
videograaf.eu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
videograaf.eu SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
NL
NL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videograaf.eu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Videograaf.eu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
videograaf.eu
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Videograaf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: