3.9 sec in total
1.2 sec
2.6 sec
88 ms
Visit videohardware.com now to see the best up-to-date Video Hardware content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about videohardware.com
Get the best computer for Abode CC, AVID Media Composer, Vegas Pro 18, Grass Valley EDIUS X, and Davinci Resolve.
Visit videohardware.comWe analyzed Videohardware.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
videohardware.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value6.3 s
11/100
25%
Value5.1 s
62/100
10%
Value430 ms
65/100
30%
Value0.015
100/100
15%
Value7.5 s
47/100
10%
1163 ms
96 ms
168 ms
236 ms
288 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Videohardware.com, 15% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 2% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Videohardware.com.
Page size can be reduced by 113.4 kB (21%)
531.9 kB
418.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Videohardware.com main page is 531.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 390.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.9 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Video Hardware needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 58.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 58.0 kB or 15% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Videohardware.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 13% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (77%)
81
19
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Video Hardware. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
home.asp
1163 ms
bootstrap.min.css
96 ms
datepicker3.css
168 ms
facebook.css
236 ms
screen.css
288 ms
pcStorefront.css
289 ms
quickview.css
291 ms
pcSearchFields.css
290 ms
search.min.css
291 ms
slidebars.min.css
304 ms
mojozoom.css
356 ms
nivo-slider.css
574 ms
productcart.css
573 ms
font-awesome.css
40 ms
css
53 ms
theme.min.css
357 ms
superfish.min.css
356 ms
jquery-1.11.0.min.js
389 ms
getgeotrustsslseal
8 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
422 ms
superfish.min.js
422 ms
jquery.pcmenu.js
424 ms
jquery.meanmenu.min.js
457 ms
modernizr.js
492 ms
angular.min.js
39 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
607 ms
jquery.form.js
607 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
607 ms
ddsmoothmenu.js
562 ms
bootstrap.js
678 ms
bootstrap-tabcollapse.js
678 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
678 ms
highslide.html.packed.js
679 ms
jquery.blockUI.js
678 ms
json3.js
678 ms
accounting.min.js
733 ms
productcart.js
735 ms
service.js
734 ms
quickcart.js
731 ms
viewcart.js
737 ms
ga_post.js
14 ms
search.js
733 ms
mojozoom.js
710 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
642 ms
analytics.js
44 ms
no_image.gif
219 ms
pc_button_viewcart.gif
219 ms
email.png
289 ms
facebook.png
293 ms
linkedin.png
295 ms
2019-logo.png
296 ms
facebook5.png
295 ms
2case1_2114_thumb.jpg
297 ms
pc_button_details.gif
295 ms
paypal.png
297 ms
amex.png
356 ms
discover.png
356 ms
mastercard.png
355 ms
visa.png
355 ms
btn_collapse.gif
335 ms
btn_expand.gif
337 ms
font
93 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
20 ms
default
267 ms
collect
39 ms
js
72 ms
right_over.gif
138 ms
down_over.gif
141 ms
right.gif
137 ms
down.gif
140 ms
shopping-bag-icon.png
137 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
66 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
64 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
68 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
68 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
64 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
67 ms
twk-main.js
70 ms
twk-vendor.js
72 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
80 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
80 ms
twk-runtime.js
101 ms
twk-app.js
78 ms
rounded-white.png
74 ms
zoomout.cur
73 ms
loader.white.gif
73 ms
videohardware.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
videohardware.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
videohardware.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videohardware.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Videohardware.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
videohardware.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Video Hardware. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: