8.6 sec in total
1.4 sec
5.5 sec
1.7 sec
Welcome to videokamera.com homepage info - get ready to check Videokamera best content right away, or after learning these important things about videokamera.com
Die wichtigsten Erlebnisse sollen mit klaren Bildern und perfektem Ton festgehalten werden. Wir helfen euch dabei, zu eurer Videokamera zu finden.
Visit videokamera.comWe analyzed Videokamera.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
videokamera.com performance score
1427 ms
263 ms
281 ms
315 ms
77 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Videokamera.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Videokamera.com.
Page size can be reduced by 762.9 kB (45%)
1.7 MB
935.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Videokamera.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 693.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Videokamera images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 423.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 423.6 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 272.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Videokamera.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 272.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (74%)
53
14
The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Videokamera. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.videokamera.com
1427 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
263 ms
styles.css
281 ms
settings.css
315 ms
css
77 ms
style.css
490 ms
prettyPhoto.css
357 ms
superfish.css
353 ms
font-awesome.css
463 ms
audioplayer.css
484 ms
owl.carousel.css
493 ms
extend-composer.css
506 ms
responsive.css
507 ms
orange.css
613 ms
js_composer.css
664 ms
css
102 ms
jquery.js
1176 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
682 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
834 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1040 ms
jquery.queryloader2.js
1725 ms
custom-loader.js
828 ms
scripts-top.js
1612 ms
jquery.nav.js
1045 ms
custom-responsive-nav.js
1045 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1176 ms
scripts.js
1177 ms
jquery.lazyload.js
1177 ms
hoverIntent.js
1213 ms
scripts-bottom.js
1210 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1210 ms
custom-isotope-portfolio.js
1211 ms
custom-isotope-blog.js
1363 ms
custom-nav.js
1367 ms
retina.min.js
1366 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1374 ms
custom-social.js
1511 ms
custom.js
1528 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1356 ms
js_composer_front.js
1350 ms
custom-parallax.js
1568 ms
analytics.js
130 ms
watch.js
126 ms
ir
779 ms
videokamera1.png
743 ms
g%C3%BCnstige-Kamera-2.jpg
747 ms
Preisleistungssieger.jpg
753 ms
solide-Kamera.jpg
1418 ms
High-end-Kamera.jpg
748 ms
GoPro.jpg
750 ms
QUMOX-Actioncam-SJ4000.jpg
749 ms
shutterstock_37595311.jpg
810 ms
Logitech_Webcam.jpg
1443 ms
Microsoft_Webcam.jpg
752 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
653 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
653 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
655 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
656 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
655 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1120 ms
collect
628 ms
videokamera.com SEO score
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videokamera.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Videokamera.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
videokamera.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Videokamera. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: