Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 52

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

videoton.ru

? ???????? ? ???????????????? ??????????? - DSR-PD175, PMW-EX1, DSR-450, HVR-Z7E, HDW-M2000P,  ????????????????, ?????????????????, ????????????, DV, ...

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

701 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

235 ms

videoton.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit videoton.ru now to see the best up-to-date Videoton content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about videoton.ru

???????????????? ???????????. ????????????, ???????????????? ????? ? ????? ????????????. ??????? ????????????????? ? ?????????? Sony, ?????????? Canon, ?????????? Panasonic. ??????? ????????? ???? Pin...

Visit videoton.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Videoton.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 701 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

videoton.ru performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value760 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

58/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

videoton.ru

701 ms

2bff0df903dc2526807ffc0d14fe6a165c0b627b-footage_banner.jpg

190 ms

3_1_FFFFFFFF_EFEFEFFF_0_pageviews

269 ms

watch.js

5 ms

share.js

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Videoton.ru, 20% (4 requests) were made to Yastatic.net and 15% (3 requests) were made to An.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (701 ms) belongs to the original domain Videoton.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 71.0 kB (41%)

Content Size

172.8 kB

After Optimization

101.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Videoton.ru main page is 172.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 80.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 66.6 kB

  • Original 80.1 kB
  • After minification 76.2 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 75.2 kB
  • After minification 73.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Videoton images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 17.5 kB
  • After minification 17.5 kB
  • After compression 14.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.8 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

17

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Videoton. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

videoton.ru accessibility score

52

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

videoton.ru best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

videoton.ru SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videoton.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Videoton.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Videoton. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: