Tools & Wizards About Us
videowall.company screenshot

Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

videowall.company

Domain gesperrt

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

363 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

205 ms

videowall.company screenshot

About Website

Welcome to videowall.company homepage info - get ready to check Videowall best content right away, or after learning these important things about videowall.company

Led Grossbildschirm mit europaweiter Tiefpreisgarantie gibt es nur bei Videowall GmbH. www.buy-a-screen.com

Visit videowall.company

Key Findings

We analyzed Videowall.company page load time and found that the first response time was 363 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

videowall.company performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

88/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.017

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

videowall.company

363 ms

sf.css

223 ms

sd.css

230 ms

sc.css

221 ms

ssb.css

223 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Videowall.company and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (446 ms) belongs to the original domain Videowall.company.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 76.9 kB (29%)

Content Size

263.1 kB

After Optimization

186.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Videowall.company main page is 263.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 159.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 13.9 kB

  • Original 18.4 kB
  • After minification 17.7 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 159.5 kB
  • After minification 154.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Videowall images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 47.6 kB

  • Original 72.2 kB
  • After minification 72.2 kB
  • After compression 24.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 47.6 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 10.1 kB

  • Original 13.1 kB
  • After minification 10.3 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Videowall.company needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (50%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Videowall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

videowall.company

videowall.company

363 ms

sf.css

sf.css

223 ms

sd.css

sd.css

230 ms

sc.css

sc.css

221 ms

ssb.css

ssb.css

223 ms

scal.css

scal.css

227 ms

jq.js

jq.js

446 ms

psdwtop.gif

psdwtop.gif

111 ms

s2dlogo.jpg

s2dlogo.jpg

394 ms

psdwbot.gif

psdwbot.gif

107 ms

videowall-gmbh_sbt.jpg

videowall-gmbh_sbt.jpg

106 ms

videowall-gmbh_640.jpg

videowall-gmbh_640.jpg

118 ms

pbull.gif

pbull.gif

111 ms

w2dsbmt.gif

w2dsbmt.gif

211 ms

w2dcpimg.php

w2dcpimg.php

225 ms

videowall-gmbh_92.jpg

videowall-gmbh_92.jpg

219 ms

283740a49f07ded010.gif

283740a49f07ded010.gif

225 ms

283740a49f07ded017.gif

283740a49f07ded017.gif

232 ms

283740a49f07ded015.gif

283740a49f07ded015.gif

315 ms

283740a49f07ded019.gif

283740a49f07ded019.gif

326 ms

283740a49f07ded012.gif

283740a49f07ded012.gif

328 ms

Accessibility Review

videowall.company accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

videowall.company best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

videowall.company SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videowall.company can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Videowall.company main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

videowall.company

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Videowall. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: