5.4 sec in total
735 ms
3.3 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Vidispine content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vidispine.com
State of the art media management and monetization solutions for media, broadcast, agencies and industries working with content, assets and video.
Visit vidispine.comWe analyzed Vidispine.com page load time and found that the first response time was 735 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
vidispine.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value2.7 s
85/100
25%
Value6.9 s
34/100
10%
Value1,700 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value9.6 s
30/100
10%
735 ms
119 ms
220 ms
225 ms
229 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Vidispine.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Hello.myfonts.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Vidispine.com.
Page size can be reduced by 202.1 kB (31%)
654.0 kB
451.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Vidispine.com main page is 654.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 382.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vidispine images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 71.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 71.2 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vidispine.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 82.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (65%)
78
27
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vidispine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 38 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vidispine.com
735 ms
node.css
119 ms
defaults.css
220 ms
system.css
225 ms
system-menus.css
229 ms
user.css
231 ms
block_edit.css
231 ms
content-module.css
233 ms
ctools.css
326 ms
date.css
334 ms
datepicker.1.7.css
340 ms
jquery.timeentry.css
343 ms
dhtml_menu.css
343 ms
filefield.css
348 ms
logintoboggan.css
433 ms
nice_menus.css
444 ms
nice_menus_default.css
452 ms
og.css
458 ms
fieldgroup.css
456 ms
views.css
463 ms
reset.css
540 ms
foundation.min.css
554 ms
MyFontsWebfontsKit.css
564 ms
layout.css
570 ms
page-backgrounds.css
569 ms
tabs.css
579 ms
messages.css
648 ms
pages.css
666 ms
block-editing.css
675 ms
blocks.css
684 ms
navigation.css
684 ms
panels-styles.css
692 ms
views-styles.css
756 ms
nodes.css
775 ms
comments.css
788 ms
forms.css
796 ms
fields.css
793 ms
jquery.min.js
822 ms
drupal.js
659 ms
block_edit.js
674 ms
dhtml_menu.js
686 ms
googleanalytics.js
691 ms
superfish.js
692 ms
jquery.bgiframe.min.js
753 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
684 ms
nice_menus.js
692 ms
og.js
697 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
692 ms
core.js
711 ms
html5shiv.js
745 ms
fileposttweaks.js
686 ms
28ff72
25 ms
logo.png
138 ms
header-bg.png
132 ms
bg1.jpg
571 ms
white_dot.png
133 ms
vidispine_arrowdown_small.png
134 ms
gradient.png
345 ms
vidispine_arrowright_small.png
220 ms
vidispine_search_icon.png
225 ms
vidispine_formats_icon.png
232 ms
vidispine_multisites_icon.png
235 ms
vidispine_integration_icon.png
328 ms
vidispine_scaleable_icon.png
336 ms
vidispine_arrowdown.png
347 ms
slidein_left.png
352 ms
vidispine_arrowleft.png
437 ms
bg2.jpg
894 ms
slidein_right.png
457 ms
vidispine_arrowright.png
460 ms
bg3.jpg
1093 ms
bg4.jpg
874 ms
bg5.jpg
1112 ms
bg6.jpg
1271 ms
bg7.jpg
910 ms
black_dot.png
982 ms
ga.js
18 ms
28FF72_0_0.woff
915 ms
28FF72_2_0.woff
933 ms
28FF72_1_0.woff
1104 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
print.css
121 ms
vidispine.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
vidispine.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Registers an unload listener
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
vidispine.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vidispine.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vidispine.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vidispine.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vidispine. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: