4.2 sec in total
271 ms
2.6 sec
1.3 sec
Visit vidmar.net now to see the best up-to-date Vidmar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vidmar.net
David Vidmar. Osebni blog in spletna stran.
Visit vidmar.netWe analyzed Vidmar.net page load time and found that the first response time was 271 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
vidmar.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
77/100
10%
Value2.6 s
87/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value210 ms
89/100
30%
Value0.109
87/100
15%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
271 ms
87 ms
1548 ms
175 ms
259 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Vidmar.net, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Feeds.feedburner.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Vidmar.net.
Page size can be reduced by 307.6 kB (62%)
495.9 kB
188.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Vidmar.net main page is 495.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 259.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 85.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.0 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Vidmar needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 193.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 193.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vidmar.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (60%)
30
12
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vidmar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vidmar.net
271 ms
weblog
87 ms
1548 ms
csharp.css
175 ms
commonstyle.css
259 ms
commonlayout.css
176 ms
lightbox.css
174 ms
style.css
268 ms
common.js
344 ms
prototype.js
511 ms
scriptaculous.js
248 ms
lightbox.js
450 ms
WebResource.axd
426 ms
ScriptResource.axd
421 ms
ScriptResource.axd
388 ms
effects.js
88 ms
ga.js
59 ms
BiteMyBytes
139 ms
bite.png
288 ms
xml.gif
285 ms
BlueTabRight.gif
285 ms
email.png
285 ms
PoweredBySubtext85x33.png
283 ms
image_3.png
318 ms
btn_profile_bluetxt_80x15.gif
257 ms
search.html
253 ms
BlueTabBackground.gif
178 ms
BlueTabBack.gif
178 ms
BlueTabFace.gif
173 ms
__utm.gif
38 ms
Logo_25gry.gif
136 ms
loading.gif
87 ms
closelabel.gif
87 ms
vidmar.net accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
vidmar.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
vidmar.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
SL
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vidmar.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Slovenian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Vidmar.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vidmar.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vidmar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: