Tools & Wizards About Us
vidsplit.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

vidsplit.de

Bad Monkee - Mobile Games

Page Load Speed

6.7 sec in total

First Response

362 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

2.9 sec

vidsplit.de screenshot

About Website

Welcome to vidsplit.de homepage info - get ready to check Vidsplit best content right away, or after learning these important things about vidsplit.de

Interested in developing a game with us? At Badmonkee, we are dedicated to expand the boundaries of mobile games.

Visit vidsplit.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Vidsplit.de page load time and found that the first response time was 362 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vidsplit.de performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.356

31/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

60/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vidsplit.de

362 ms

badmonkee.de

397 ms

92 ms

702 ms

bootstrap.min.css

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Vidsplit.de, 86% (38 requests) were made to Badmonkee.de and 7% (3 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Badmonkee.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 161.2 kB (5%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vidsplit.de main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 13.5 kB

  • Original 16.8 kB
  • After minification 13.2 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.6 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 103.3 kB

  • Original 3.2 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vidsplit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 25.0 kB

  • Original 130.6 kB
  • After minification 124.7 kB
  • After compression 105.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.0 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 22.7 kB
  • After minification 16.6 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vidsplit.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (21%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vidsplit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vidsplit.de

vidsplit.de

362 ms

badmonkee.de

badmonkee.de

397 ms

92 ms

702 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

24 ms

bootstrap-theme.min.css

bootstrap-theme.min.css

41 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

65 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

197 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

118 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

50 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

328 ms

custom.css

custom.css

405 ms

custom.js

custom.js

304 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

455 ms

close.png

close.png

163 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

159 ms

prev.png

prev.png

158 ms

next.png

next.png

159 ms

logo_badmonkee_hd.png

logo_badmonkee_hd.png

215 ms

ico_facebook_2x.png

ico_facebook_2x.png

238 ms

ico_twitter_2x.png

ico_twitter_2x.png

244 ms

ico_xing_2x.png

ico_xing_2x.png

243 ms

ico_behance_2x.png

ico_behance_2x.png

241 ms

btn_navi1_m_hd.png

btn_navi1_m_hd.png

320 ms

slider-image_hd.jpg

slider-image_hd.jpg

717 ms

ico_readmore_hd.png

ico_readmore_hd.png

335 ms

teaser_spintales_hd.jpg

teaser_spintales_hd.jpg

824 ms

teaser_rivals_hd.jpg

teaser_rivals_hd.jpg

937 ms

teaser_speed_islands_hd.jpg

teaser_speed_islands_hd.jpg

820 ms

teaser_goalone_hd.jpg

teaser_goalone_hd.jpg

819 ms

teaser_mydiamonds_hd.jpg

teaser_mydiamonds_hd.jpg

796 ms

artem_hd.jpg

artem_hd.jpg

858 ms

jens_hd.jpg

jens_hd.jpg

898 ms

boris_hd.jpg

boris_hd.jpg

925 ms

nenad_hd.jpg

nenad_hd.jpg

926 ms

mobile-frontend-developer.jpg

mobile-frontend-developer.jpg

994 ms

backend-developer.jpg

backend-developer.jpg

993 ms

contact.jpg

contact.jpg

990 ms

facebook.jpg

facebook.jpg

1022 ms

xing.jpg

xing.jpg

1020 ms

Neris-Light-webfont.woff

Neris-Light-webfont.woff

866 ms

Neris-Thin-webfont.woff

Neris-Thin-webfont.woff

899 ms

slider_point2_hd.png

slider_point2_hd.png

908 ms

slider_point1_hd.png

slider_point1_hd.png

908 ms

Accessibility Review

vidsplit.de accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

vidsplit.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

vidsplit.de SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vidsplit.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Vidsplit.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vidsplit.de

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vidsplit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: