Tools & Wizards About Us
vidtest.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 65

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 88

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    65% of websites

vidtest.net

Home

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

910 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

104 ms

vidtest.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Vidtest content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vidtest.net

Test video and audio material. Low resolution, SD, HD, 2K, 4K, 3D with documented real video, synthetic, test patterns and eye test set.

Visit vidtest.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Vidtest.net page load time and found that the first response time was 910 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vidtest.net performance score

65

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

77/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.068

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

79/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vidtest.net

910 ms

content.css

58 ms

mootools-core.js

164 ms

core.js

108 ms

jquery.min.js

178 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Vidtest.net, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (910 ms) belongs to the original domain Vidtest.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 54.0 kB (23%)

Content Size

230.0 kB

After Optimization

176.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vidtest.net main page is 230.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 143.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 14.1 kB
  • After minification 13.4 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 37.4 kB

  • Original 58.8 kB
  • After minification 21.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Vidtest needs image optimization as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 64% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 4.5 kB

  • Original 143.8 kB
  • After minification 143.8 kB
  • After compression 139.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 13.4 kB
  • After minification 13.4 kB
  • After compression 11.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vidtest.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.8 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (48%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vidtest. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vidtest.net

vidtest.net

910 ms

content.css

content.css

58 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

164 ms

core.js

core.js

108 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

178 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

110 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

111 ms

caption.js

caption.js

109 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

162 ms

system.css

system.css

193 ms

general.css

general.css

177 ms

template.css

template.css

193 ms

template.responsive.css

template.responsive.css

215 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

231 ms

script.js

script.js

222 ms

script.responsive.js

script.responsive.js

224 ms

system.css

system.css

57 ms

ga.js

ga.js

54 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

55 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

58 ms

8K.png

8K.png

57 ms

4K_128.png

4K_128.png

65 ms

2K_128.png

2K_128.png

60 ms

hD_128.png

hD_128.png

59 ms

Test%20Patterns_128.png

Test%20Patterns_128.png

108 ms

Pro%20Player_128.png

Pro%20Player_128.png

113 ms

Export%20and%20Convert_128.png

Export%20and%20Convert_128.png

119 ms

3D_128.png

3D_128.png

112 ms

youtube-03.png

youtube-03.png

114 ms

twitter_32-2.png

twitter_32-2.png

118 ms

facebook_32-2.png

facebook_32-2.png

163 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

Accessibility Review

vidtest.net accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vidtest.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

vidtest.net SEO score

88

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vidtest.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vidtest.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vidtest.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vidtest. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: