Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

view.nl

Ieder dossier direct beschikbaar - View documentbeheer

Page Load Speed

6.1 sec in total

First Response

424 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

2.1 sec

view.nl screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing View content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about view.nl

View documentbeheer zijn specialisten in archiefopslag, digitaliseren en beheren van dossiers voor elk bedrijf en organisatie in Nederland.

Visit view.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed View.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 424 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

view.nl performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value17,940 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.182

67/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

view.nl

424 ms

view.nl

363 ms

www.view.nl

1044 ms

gtm.js

66 ms

css

233 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original View.nl, 41% (18 requests) were made to Cdn.i-pulse.nl and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.i-pulse.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (24%)

Content Size

4.3 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

In fact, the total size of View.nl main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 59.6 kB

  • Original 74.3 kB
  • After minification 57.1 kB
  • After compression 14.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.2 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 959.0 kB

  • Original 4.1 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, View needs image optimization as it can save up to 959.0 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 47.6 kB
  • After minification 47.6 kB
  • After compression 45.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (32%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

26

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of View. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

view.nl accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

view.nl best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

view.nl SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise View.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that View.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of View. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: