4.6 sec in total
984 ms
3.5 sec
133 ms
Visit vigortek.net now to see the best up-to-date Vigor Tek content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vigortek.net
Providers of high-end routers, load-balancers and servers. Custom solutions tailored to your particular needs.
Visit vigortek.netWe analyzed Vigortek.net page load time and found that the first response time was 984 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
vigortek.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
12/100
10%
Value8.7 s
1/100
25%
Value8.0 s
21/100
10%
Value3,230 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.186
66/100
15%
Value10.2 s
25/100
10%
984 ms
162 ms
260 ms
282 ms
289 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Vigortek.net, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (984 ms) belongs to the original domain Vigortek.net.
Page size can be reduced by 55.5 kB (9%)
622.4 kB
567.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Vigortek.net main page is 622.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 356.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vigor Tek images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 282 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 544 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vigortek.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (84%)
49
8
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vigor Tek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vigortek.net
984 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
162 ms
style.min.css
260 ms
flexy-breadcrumb-public.css
282 ms
font-awesome.min.css
289 ms
all.min.css
292 ms
simple-line-icons.min.css
285 ms
style.min.css
385 ms
fontawesome-all.min.css
354 ms
frontend.css
377 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
380 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
382 ms
frontend.min.css
398 ms
post-812.css
446 ms
global.css
470 ms
post-62.css
475 ms
widgets.css
476 ms
css
29 ms
jquery.min.js
487 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
487 ms
smoothscroll.min.js
542 ms
animations.min.css
576 ms
flexy-breadcrumb-public.js
581 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
581 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
585 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
588 ms
sidr.js
632 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
657 ms
theme.vanilla.min.js
755 ms
frontend.js
663 ms
wp-embed.min.js
673 ms
make-column-clickable.js
675 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
725 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
751 ms
waypoints.min.js
761 ms
core.min.js
767 ms
swiper.min.js
773 ms
share-link.min.js
761 ms
dialog.min.js
691 ms
frontend.min.js
593 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
675 ms
underscore.min.js
581 ms
wp-util.min.js
581 ms
frontend.min.js
624 ms
brand.png
393 ms
h550_carousel-o726phblhjqavigdhi9mqb4wxlfy567c8blslcpyim.jpg
489 ms
company_carousel-o726pj79v7sviqdn6j2vvanu4d6okkeswkwrjwn666.jpg
421 ms
support_thumbnail-1.jpg
606 ms
h880-768x435.jpg
460 ms
oldtown_thumbnail.jpg
673 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
655 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
566 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
524 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
556 ms
eicons.woff
798 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
744 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
664 ms
Simple-Line-Icons.ttf
674 ms
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
0 ms
vigortek.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
vigortek.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
vigortek.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vigortek.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vigortek.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vigortek.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vigor Tek. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: