2.7 sec in total
356 ms
2.1 sec
263 ms
Welcome to vijverberg.com homepage info - get ready to check Vijverberg best content right away, or after learning these important things about vijverberg.com
Vijverberg biedt een totaaloplossing voor het beheersen van bouwprojecten van engineering, procurement, construction t/m commissioning.
Visit vijverberg.comWe analyzed Vijverberg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 356 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
vijverberg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
51/100
10%
Value6.9 s
6/100
25%
Value6.9 s
34/100
10%
Value5,280 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.435
21/100
15%
Value8.8 s
36/100
10%
356 ms
351 ms
352 ms
612 ms
783 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Vijverberg.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (859 ms) belongs to the original domain Vijverberg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 405.5 kB (22%)
1.8 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Vijverberg.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vijverberg images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 358.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 358.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vijverberg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (48%)
29
15
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vijverberg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vijverberg.com
356 ms
home.css
351 ms
jq-ui-frontend.css
352 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
612 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.21.custom.min.js
783 ms
jquery.bgpos.js
353 ms
site_functions.js
521 ms
api.js
41 ms
frontend_styles.css
175 ms
elements.css
176 ms
layout_background.jpg
693 ms
bg_header.png
175 ms
trans_logo.png
176 ms
bttn_search.png
176 ms
recaptcha__en.js
53 ms
ga.js
29 ms
bg_white.png
189 ms
slider_vag.jpg
624 ms
slider_mc.jpg
687 ms
slider_tracc.jpg
689 ms
slider_ac.jpg
691 ms
bg_black.png
339 ms
SGS_ISO-9001_TCL_LR.jpg
513 ms
RVA_C055_LR.jpg
685 ms
tab_icons.png
859 ms
bg_trans.png
834 ms
kt_referenties.png
838 ms
kt_contact2.png
839 ms
bg_footer.png
841 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
vijverberg.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
vijverberg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
vijverberg.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vijverberg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Vijverberg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vijverberg.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vijverberg. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: