Tools & Wizards About Us
villageofcaroline.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

villageofcaroline.com

Village of Caroline | Offer Residents Visitors Surrounding Community

Page Load Speed

21.4 sec in total

First Response

103 ms

Resources Loaded

20.5 sec

Page Rendered

776 ms

villageofcaroline.com screenshot

About Website

Visit villageofcaroline.com now to see the best up-to-date Village Of Caroline content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about villageofcaroline.com

Village of Caroline has much to offer our residents, visitors, and the surrounding rural neighborhood. Learn more about our community.

Visit villageofcaroline.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Villageofcaroline.com page load time and found that the first response time was 103 ms and then it took 21.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

villageofcaroline.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value770 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

58/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

villageofcaroline.com

103 ms

villageofcaroline.com

78 ms

style.min.css

119 ms

all.min.css

123 ms

4-layout.css

133 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Villageofcaroline.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Villageofcaroline.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 168.7 kB (20%)

Content Size

825.8 kB

After Optimization

657.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Villageofcaroline.com main page is 825.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 428.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 64.5 kB

  • Original 80.5 kB
  • After minification 78.9 kB
  • After compression 16.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 428.7 kB
  • After minification 427.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Village Of Caroline images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 101.7 kB

  • Original 224.6 kB
  • After minification 224.1 kB
  • After compression 122.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 101.7 kB or 45% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 92.1 kB
  • After minification 92.0 kB
  • After compression 90.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Villageofcaroline.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (64%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Village Of Caroline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

villageofcaroline.com

villageofcaroline.com

103 ms

villageofcaroline.com

villageofcaroline.com

78 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

119 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

123 ms

4-layout.css

4-layout.css

133 ms

animate.css

animate.css

128 ms

8b620dd8a1f16fbea3611846c5a6d832-layout-bundle.css

8b620dd8a1f16fbea3611846c5a6d832-layout-bundle.css

19563 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

140 ms

latest.css

latest.css

204 ms

GD-cORe-public.css

GD-cORe-public.css

240 ms

jquery.magnificpopup.min.css

jquery.magnificpopup.min.css

224 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

278 ms

skin-664f88e39ba29.css

skin-664f88e39ba29.css

267 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

306 ms

css

css

43 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

341 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

332 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

354 ms

GD-cORe-public.js

GD-cORe-public.js

386 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

435 ms

css

css

39 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

406 ms

4-layout.js

4-layout.js

431 ms

coblocks-animation.js

coblocks-animation.js

430 ms

tiny-swiper.js

tiny-swiper.js

493 ms

coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js

coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js

515 ms

jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js

jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js

546 ms

29971ab3211a4e93dcb394dc99e4a30e-layout-bundle.js

29971ab3211a4e93dcb394dc99e4a30e-layout-bundle.js

515 ms

jquery.magnificpopup.min.js

jquery.magnificpopup.min.js

530 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

592 ms

theme.min.js

theme.min.js

628 ms

tti.min.js

tti.min.js

12 ms

aadc63d8e8dbd533470bdc4e350bc4af

aadc63d8e8dbd533470bdc4e350bc4af

140 ms

059.png

059.png

127 ms

hero-bg.jpg

hero-bg.jpg

127 ms

hero-1.jpg

hero-1.jpg

300 ms

News-Release-Amalgamation-July-24-2024-FINAL-791x1024.jpg

News-Release-Amalgamation-July-24-2024-FINAL-791x1024.jpg

327 ms

Adjournment.jpg

Adjournment.jpg

302 ms

Public-Hearing-March-27th-2024.jpg

Public-Hearing-March-27th-2024.jpg

352 ms

rocky-Senior-002.jpg

rocky-Senior-002.jpg

299 ms

bg.png

bg.png

299 ms

CG_farming2.jpg

CG_farming2.jpg

430 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

412 ms

3-1.jpg

3-1.jpg

433 ms

qtq80-IT1qoz.jpeg

qtq80-IT1qoz.jpeg

394 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

393 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

155 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

155 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

228 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

504 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

529 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

572 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtY.ttf

252 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf

254 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

128 ms

Accessibility Review

villageofcaroline.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

villageofcaroline.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

villageofcaroline.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Villageofcaroline.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Villageofcaroline.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

villageofcaroline.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Village Of Caroline. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: