Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

vink.net

Home | Vink Standbouw

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

398 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

395 ms

vink.net screenshot

About Website

Visit vink.net now to see the best up-to-date Vink content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vink.net

Vink zorgt al 35 jaar voor unieke stands en events op maat. Wij zorgen voor een perfecte presentatie van jouw organisatie op elke beurs of evenement.

Visit vink.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Vink.net page load time and found that the first response time was 398 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vink.net performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

47/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vink.net

398 ms

vink.net

907 ms

js

73 ms

gtm.js

160 ms

hiz3erf.js

104 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Vink.net, 31% (13 requests) were made to Mindcms-main.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com and 17% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (907 ms) belongs to the original domain Vink.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 31.4 kB (19%)

Content Size

161.8 kB

After Optimization

130.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Vink.net main page is 161.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 84.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 29.3 kB

  • Original 37.6 kB
  • After minification 37.4 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 84.1 kB
  • After minification 82.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vink images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 40.2 kB
  • After minification 40.2 kB
  • After compression 40.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (30%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

vink.net accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vink.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

vink.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vink.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vink.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vink. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: