Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 46

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

vintagewriting.com

Fine writing instruments for people who really use them

Page Load Speed

497 ms in total

First Response

148 ms

Resources Loaded

268 ms

Page Rendered

81 ms

vintagewriting.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Vintage Writing content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vintagewriting.com

Illustrated catalogue of fine vintage pens and pencils for sale; flexible, stub, italic, and other special nibs; other vintage items like wristwatches and eyeglasses. New England Pen Show details. Fin...

Visit vintagewriting.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vintagewriting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 148 ms and then it took 349 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vintagewriting.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vintagewriting.com

148 ms

ga.js

8 ms

logo8.JPG

74 ms

jadebalancesetgalw.JPG

66 ms

tavannesegg1w.JPG

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Vintagewriting.com, 14% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (148 ms) belongs to the original domain Vintagewriting.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 9.3 kB (11%)

Content Size

83.3 kB

After Optimization

74.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Vintagewriting.com main page is 83.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 59.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 7.1 kB
  • After minification 7.0 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 59.0 kB
  • After minification 54.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vintage Writing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vintage Writing. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

vintagewriting.com accessibility score

46

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

vintagewriting.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

vintagewriting.com SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vintagewriting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vintagewriting.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vintage Writing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: