Tools & Wizards About Us
vipdeposit.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

vipdeposit.com

ecoPayz, Binance and MuchBetter Loyalty Program | VipDeposits

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

60 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

3.2 sec

vipdeposit.com screenshot

About Website

Visit vipdeposit.com now to see the best up-to-date Vip Deposit content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vipdeposit.com

Join ecoPayz, Binance and MuchBetter with VipDeposits loyalty program. Get VIP privileges on the best terms, 24/7 support and faster account verification.

Visit vipdeposit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vipdeposit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vipdeposit.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,030 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.0 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vipdeposits.com

60 ms

vipdeposits.com

1082 ms

slick.css

23 ms

jquery.nselect.css

62 ms

style.min.css

29 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Vipdeposit.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Google.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Vipdeposits.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 88.9 kB (17%)

Content Size

527.8 kB

After Optimization

438.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vipdeposit.com main page is 527.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 309.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 67.5 kB

  • Original 84.6 kB
  • After minification 84.6 kB
  • After compression 17.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 13.8 kB

  • Original 54.5 kB
  • After minification 40.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Vip Deposit needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 309.9 kB
  • After minification 309.9 kB
  • After compression 307.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 78.8 kB
  • After minification 78.8 kB
  • After compression 73.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vipdeposit.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (55%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

25

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vip Deposit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vipdeposits.com

vipdeposits.com

60 ms

vipdeposits.com

vipdeposits.com

1082 ms

slick.css

slick.css

23 ms

jquery.nselect.css

jquery.nselect.css

62 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

29 ms

styles.css

styles.css

470 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

32 ms

ea-style.css

ea-style.css

45 ms

yop-poll-public-6.3.1.css

yop-poll-public-6.3.1.css

33 ms

style.css

style.css

45 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

58 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

58 ms

yop-poll-public-6.3.1.min.js

yop-poll-public-6.3.1.min.js

60 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

501 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

61 ms

jquery.nselect.js

jquery.nselect.js

60 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

40 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.js

jquery.fancybox.min.js

55 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

61 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

73 ms

index.js

index.js

71 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

497 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

71 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

81 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

81 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

85 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

92 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

89 ms

api.js

api.js

55 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

95 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

100 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

155 ms

main-logo-vd.png

main-logo-vd.png

41 ms

main-logo.png

main-logo.png

484 ms

banner-bg-2.svg

banner-bg-2.svg

63 ms

checklist-marker.svg

checklist-marker.svg

61 ms

image-2.png

image-2.png

41 ms

1200px-Binance_logo.svg.png

1200px-Binance_logo.svg.png

59 ms

muchbetter_trans-1.png

muchbetter_trans-1.png

469 ms

banner-bg-figures.svg

banner-bg-figures.svg

611 ms

4.svg

4.svg

64 ms

image-12.png

image-12.png

69 ms

image-1.png

image-1.png

70 ms

1-2.svg

1-2.svg

94 ms

2-1.svg

2-1.svg

100 ms

asdqq.svg

asdqq.svg

104 ms

4-1.svg

4-1.svg

127 ms

main-form-join-image-3.svg

main-form-join-image-3.svg

134 ms

main-logo-light.png

main-logo-light.png

133 ms

checkbox.svg

checkbox.svg

114 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

82 ms

icon-arrow-bottom.svg

icon-arrow-bottom.svg

64 ms

icon-select-arrow.svg

icon-select-arrow.svg

66 ms

fallback

fallback

25 ms

fallback

fallback

29 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

3 ms

css

css

32 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

12 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

21 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

25 ms

Accessibility Review

vipdeposit.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vipdeposit.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

vipdeposit.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vipdeposit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Russian language. Our system also found out that Vipdeposit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vipdeposit.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vip Deposit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: