11.2 sec in total
698 ms
9.8 sec
725 ms
Welcome to viplash.ru homepage info - get ready to check Viplash best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about viplash.ru
Интернет-магазин для лэшмейкеров Viplash.ru предлагает купить материалы и всё для наращивания ресниц, товары и средства для ламинирования, инструменты. Доставка в Москве, Омске и по всей России.
Visit viplash.ruWe analyzed Viplash.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 698 ms and then it took 10.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
viplash.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value26.8 s
0/100
25%
Value20.5 s
0/100
10%
Value3,690 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.582
11/100
15%
Value41.2 s
0/100
10%
698 ms
160 ms
332 ms
338 ms
332 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Viplash.ru, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Viplash.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 641.5 kB (18%)
3.5 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Viplash.ru main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 219.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Viplash images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 328.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 328.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Viplash.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 65.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (36%)
76
49
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Viplash. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
viplash.ru
698 ms
stylesheet.css
160 ms
cloud-zoom.css
332 ms
prettyPhoto.css
338 ms
tip-twitter.css
332 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.css
339 ms
colorbox.css
348 ms
styles-carousel.css
346 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
680 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.16.custom.min.js
875 ms
common.js
510 ms
cloud-zoom.1.0.2.js
521 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
520 ms
jquery.poshytip.min.js
520 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
696 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
699 ms
script1.js
696 ms
script2.js
699 ms
carousel.js
858 ms
up_block_back.png
1141 ms
left_block_back.png
872 ms
right_block_back.png
1332 ms
logo_left_head.png
168 ms
call_me_baby.png
170 ms
ask_me_baby.png
341 ms
search_now.png
369 ms
cart_empty.png
333 ms
line_horiozntal.png
556 ms
galka_menu_cont.png
559 ms
left_slider.png
956 ms
right_slider.png
705 ms
pick_20.jpg
1012 ms
pick_21.jpg
1150 ms
pick_18.jpg
1015 ms
pick_12.jpg
8118 ms
pick_5.jpg
1336 ms
baner_pick_inf.png
1344 ms
block_home_1.png
1302 ms
block_home_2.png
1640 ms
block_home_3.png
1462 ms
mid_100_kachestvo.png
1474 ms
848-220x220-220x220.jpg
1479 ms
4-15-220x220.jpg
1480 ms
7-220x220.jpg
1606 ms
IMG_9940-220x220.jpg
1630 ms
2-220x220.jpg
1636 ms
karusel_1.jpg
1646 ms
862-220x220.jpg
1802 ms
1112-220x220.jpg
1838 ms
794-220x220.jpg
1844 ms
410-220x220.jpg
1845 ms
708-220x220.jpg
1865 ms
772-220x220.jpg
1979 ms
01%20(19)-220x220.jpg
2004 ms
1145-220x220.jpg
1954 ms
watch.js
45 ms
analytics.js
78 ms
SACZ2VE3.TTF
2742 ms
spets_predl.jpg
1880 ms
collect
48 ms
firmi_bottom_1.png
2085 ms
firmi_bottom_2.png
2622 ms
firmi_bottom_3.png
2174 ms
sheri_logo_new_top.png
2451 ms
logo_propul.png
2022 ms
viplash_prof_kol.png
3814 ms
vk_logo.png
1918 ms
face_logo.png
2030 ms
inst_logo.png
2094 ms
persona.png
3723 ms
youtube.png
2073 ms
sale.png
2072 ms
bay_pls.png
2023 ms
left_karusel.png
2118 ms
right_karusel.png
2108 ms
bottom_block_for.png
2162 ms
overlay.png
2120 ms
border.png
2108 ms
controls.png
2219 ms
viplash.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
viplash.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
viplash.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Viplash.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Viplash.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
viplash.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Viplash. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: