Tools & Wizards About Us
vironova.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 84

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

vironova.com

Vironova - Quality control of nanoparticles using TEM analysis

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

301 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

293 ms

vironova.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Vironova content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vironova.com

We provide comprehensive TEM solutions and electron microscopy services from the world's only GMP certified lab. Talk with one of our TEM experts today!

Visit vironova.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vironova.com page load time and found that the first response time was 301 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vironova.com performance score

84

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

80/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

89/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vironova.com

301 ms

www.qutem.com

629 ms

qutem.com

199 ms

qutem.com

562 ms

app.js

109 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Vironova.com, 97% (37 requests) were made to Qutem.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (800 ms) relates to the external source Qutem.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 153.6 kB (41%)

Content Size

371.1 kB

After Optimization

217.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Vironova.com main page is 371.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 188.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 153.6 kB

  • Original 188.0 kB
  • After minification 184.7 kB
  • After compression 34.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 153.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 183.1 kB
  • After minification 183.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vironova images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (84%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vironova. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vironova.com

vironova.com

301 ms

www.qutem.com

www.qutem.com

629 ms

qutem.com

qutem.com

199 ms

qutem.com

qutem.com

562 ms

app.js

app.js

109 ms

app.js

app.js

337 ms

app.js

app.js

329 ms

favicon.js

favicon.js

341 ms

scroll-to-top.js

scroll-to-top.js

338 ms

manifest.js

manifest.js

339 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

343 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

435 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

549 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

453 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

450 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

453 ms

app.js

app.js

455 ms

initial-load.js

initial-load.js

536 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

573 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

570 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

568 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

573 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

636 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

655 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

676 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

684 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

686 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

688 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

736 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

754 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

800 ms

fa-regular-400-optimized.woff

fa-regular-400-optimized.woff

660 ms

fa-light-300-optimized.woff

fa-light-300-optimized.woff

661 ms

fa-sharp-regular-400-optimized.woff

fa-sharp-regular-400-optimized.woff

661 ms

qutem-aav-cryo-1-1-720x526.jpeg

qutem-aav-cryo-1-1-720x526.jpeg

363 ms

jn-cropped-1mb-720x743.jpg

jn-cropped-1mb-720x743.jpg

363 ms

gmp-stamp-1-e1716385276997-720x485.jpeg

gmp-stamp-1-e1716385276997-720x485.jpeg

362 ms

045-11786-1000-s1-i1-2061-20210526-1-jpeg.webp

045-11786-1000-s1-i1-2061-20210526-1-jpeg.webp

721 ms

Accessibility Review

vironova.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

vironova.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

vironova.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vironova.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vironova.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vironova.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vironova. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: