Tools & Wizards About Us
virtuapin.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

virtuapin.net

VirtuaPin, The Virtual Pinball Cabinet

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

143 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

277 ms

virtuapin.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Virtua Pin content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about virtuapin.net

Virtual Pinball Cabinet Distributor

Visit virtuapin.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Virtuapin.net page load time and found that the first response time was 143 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

virtuapin.net performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.063

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

77/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

virtuapin.net

143 ms

virtuapin.net

568 ms

stylesheet.css

137 ms

stylesheet_css_buttons.css

139 ms

jscript_google_tag_manager.js

141 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Virtuapin.net, 8% (2 requests) were made to Paypalobjects.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (568 ms) belongs to the original domain Virtuapin.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 770.3 kB (45%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

947.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Virtuapin.net main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 23.9 kB
  • After minification 21.7 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 747.2 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 917.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Virtua Pin needs image optimization as it can save up to 747.2 kB or 45% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 23.9 kB
  • After minification 22.9 kB
  • After compression 22.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 5.6 kB
  • After minification 5.3 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Virtuapin.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.2 kB or 39% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (21%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Virtua Pin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

virtuapin.net

virtuapin.net

143 ms

virtuapin.net

virtuapin.net

568 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

137 ms

stylesheet_css_buttons.css

stylesheet_css_buttons.css

139 ms

jscript_google_tag_manager.js

jscript_google_tag_manager.js

141 ms

jscript_imghover1.js

jscript_imghover1.js

141 ms

jscript_imghover2.js

jscript_imghover2.js

142 ms

jscript_winpopup.js

jscript_winpopup.js

141 ms

AM_mc_vs_dc_ae.jpg

AM_mc_vs_dc_ae.jpg

25 ms

blue-seal-280-80-virtuapin-cabinets-90019492.png

blue-seal-280-80-virtuapin-cabinets-90019492.png

31 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

22 ms

tile_back.gif

tile_back.gif

60 ms

header_bg.jpg

header_bg.jpg

151 ms

VPCMainPageLogo.png

VPCMainPageLogo.png

151 ms

Mini1.jpg

Mini1.jpg

190 ms

stars_5.gif

stars_5.gif

59 ms

VirtPin42.jpg

VirtPin42.jpg

240 ms

VPC-MainPage1.png

VPC-MainPage1.png

426 ms

TAFRight.jpg

TAFRight.jpg

288 ms

VPC-UltKit.jpg

VPC-UltKit.jpg

280 ms

Finished%20WPC%20Widebody.jpg

Finished%20WPC%20Widebody.jpg

287 ms

VPF.jpg

VPF.jpg

238 ms

collect

collect

14 ms

js

js

51 ms

verification_seal.gif

verification_seal.gif

6 ms

print_stylesheet.css

print_stylesheet.css

48 ms

Accessibility Review

virtuapin.net accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

virtuapin.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

virtuapin.net SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Virtuapin.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Virtuapin.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

virtuapin.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Virtua Pin. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: