3.3 sec in total
177 ms
2.7 sec
442 ms
Visit virussign.net now to see the best up-to-date Virus Sign content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about virussign.net
Giant malware database dedicated to combating threats in the digital world. The biggest malware samples repository for researchers.
Visit virussign.netWe analyzed Virussign.net page load time and found that the first response time was 177 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
virussign.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value11.6 s
0/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value590 ms
51/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.3 s
19/100
10%
177 ms
953 ms
220 ms
295 ms
222 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Virussign.net, 95% (37 requests) were made to Virussign.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Virussign.com.
Page size can be reduced by 511.0 kB (27%)
1.9 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Virussign.net main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 85.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 109.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Virus Sign images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 246.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 246.1 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Virussign.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 70.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (43%)
37
21
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Virus Sign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
virussign.net
177 ms
www.virussign.com
953 ms
style.min.css
220 ms
style.min.css
295 ms
style.min.css
222 ms
styles.css
226 ms
jquery.min.js
226 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
224 ms
wdt.chartsRender.min.js
223 ms
Chart.js
525 ms
wdt.chartJS.min.js
298 ms
view.min.js
297 ms
common.js
298 ms
gcm.js
299 ms
js
79 ms
infoot.js
228 ms
simpleParallax.min.js
300 ms
countup.min.js
307 ms
typed.min.js
308 ms
scripts.js
308 ms
ico-data01.svg
309 ms
ico-shield.svg
318 ms
ico-fingerprint03.svg
321 ms
ico-ai03.svg
322 ms
ico-data03.svg
324 ms
ico-trusted01.svg
325 ms
client_photo_01-e1686868454388.jpg
528 ms
client_photo_02.jpg
687 ms
client_photo_03.jpg
541 ms
logo-google.svg
394 ms
logo-microsoft.svg
398 ms
logo-nsuflorida.svg
399 ms
logo-norton.svg
467 ms
ico-customized.svg
470 ms
partner03-1024x819.png
1059 ms
logo-virussign.png
89 ms
banner01.png
385 ms
data01.png
151 ms
logo-virussign-white.svg
88 ms
virussign.net accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
virussign.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
virussign.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Virussign.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Virussign.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
virussign.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Virus Sign. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: