3.7 sec in total
209 ms
3 sec
492 ms
Visit virussign.net now to see the best up-to-date Virus Sign content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about virussign.net
Giant malware database dedicated to combating threats in the digital world. The biggest malware samples repository for researchers.
Visit virussign.netWe analyzed Virussign.net page load time and found that the first response time was 209 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
virussign.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value9.8 s
0/100
25%
Value7.9 s
22/100
10%
Value190 ms
90/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.7 s
29/100
10%
209 ms
1207 ms
219 ms
300 ms
226 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Virussign.net, 90% (38 requests) were made to Virussign.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Virussign.com.
Page size can be reduced by 527.7 kB (28%)
1.9 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Virussign.net main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 86.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 109.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Virus Sign images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 262.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 262.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Virussign.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 69.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (43%)
40
23
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Virus Sign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
virussign.net
209 ms
www.virussign.com
1207 ms
style.min.css
219 ms
style.min.css
300 ms
style.min.css
226 ms
styles.css
233 ms
jquery.min.js
296 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
228 ms
wdt.chartsRender.min.js
230 ms
Chart.js
536 ms
wdt.chartJS.min.js
313 ms
interactivity.min.js
375 ms
view.min.js
313 ms
common.js
314 ms
js
77 ms
infoot.js
299 ms
simpleParallax.min.js
304 ms
countup.min.js
311 ms
typed.min.js
312 ms
scripts.js
372 ms
ico-data01.svg
309 ms
ico-malware02.svg
324 ms
ico-analysis02.svg
328 ms
ico-ai01.svg
332 ms
ico-data03.svg
335 ms
ico-shield.svg
337 ms
client_photo_01-e1686868454388.jpg
526 ms
client_photo_02.jpg
693 ms
client_photo_03.jpg
552 ms
logo-psc.svg
407 ms
logo-google.svg
409 ms
logo-microsoft.svg
411 ms
logo-nsuflorida.svg
482 ms
ico-trusted01.svg
484 ms
ico-customized.svg
486 ms
partner03-1024x819.png
1087 ms
logo-virussign.png
138 ms
banner01.png
618 ms
data01.png
312 ms
logo-virussign-white.svg
137 ms
40 ms
26 ms
virussign.net accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
virussign.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
virussign.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Virussign.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Virussign.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
virussign.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Virus Sign. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: