14.1 sec in total
436 ms
13 sec
740 ms
Welcome to visicase.com homepage info - get ready to check Visicase best content for Australia right away, or after learning these important things about visicase.com
If you were happy with ‘Just OK’, you probably wouldn’t be here. VisiCase is a leading Care Management System for NDIS and Aged Care providers across Australia. Contact Us About Us At VisiCase, we bel...
Visit visicase.comWe analyzed Visicase.com page load time and found that the first response time was 436 ms and then it took 13.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
visicase.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value5.8 s
15/100
25%
Value15.6 s
0/100
10%
Value530 ms
55/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value11.7 s
17/100
10%
436 ms
7300 ms
69 ms
432 ms
659 ms
Our browser made a total of 134 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (101 requests) were addressed to the original Visicase.com, 20% (27 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Visicase.com.
Page size can be reduced by 337.9 kB (6%)
5.6 MB
5.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Visicase.com main page is 5.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 210.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 210.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 119.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Visicase images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Visicase.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 85 (81%)
105
20
The browser has sent 105 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Visicase. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
visicase.com
436 ms
visicase.com
7300 ms
js
69 ms
main.min.css
432 ms
frontend.css
659 ms
styles.css
653 ms
contact-form-7-main.min.css
655 ms
scroll-top.css
657 ms
buttons.min.css
663 ms
dashicons.min.css
886 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
868 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
870 ms
media-views.min.css
876 ms
imgareaselect.css
874 ms
uacf7-frontend.css
879 ms
form-style.css
1084 ms
columns.css
1087 ms
multistep.css
1091 ms
star-rating.css
1090 ms
all.css
1100 ms
jquery-ui.css
24 ms
style.css
1103 ms
countrySelect.min.css
1302 ms
style.css
1306 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
1309 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
1307 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
1321 ms
swiper.min.css
1328 ms
post-7.css
1518 ms
main.css
1522 ms
global.css
1523 ms
post-179.css
1527 ms
post-163.css
1536 ms
post-195.css
1537 ms
style.css
1734 ms
css
46 ms
fontawesome.min.css
1741 ms
solid.min.css
1739 ms
regular.min.css
1746 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
1756 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
34 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.min.js
49 ms
jquery.min.js
1560 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1524 ms
workflow.bundle.js
1308 ms
utils.min.js
1304 ms
moxie.min.js
1528 ms
plupload.min.js
1315 ms
frontend.min.js
1326 ms
hooks.min.js
1304 ms
i18n.min.js
1305 ms
index.js
1302 ms
index.js
1432 ms
jquery.scrollUp.min.js
1432 ms
underscore.min.js
1507 ms
shortcode.min.js
1313 ms
backbone.min.js
1311 ms
wp-util.min.js
1335 ms
wp-backbone.min.js
1335 ms
media-models.min.js
1325 ms
wp-plupload.min.js
1504 ms
core.min.js
1308 ms
mouse.min.js
1303 ms
sortable.min.js
1308 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1323 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
1326 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
1493 ms
api-request.min.js
1307 ms
dom-ready.min.js
1303 ms
a11y.min.js
1308 ms
clipboard.min.js
1318 ms
media-views.min.js
1325 ms
media-editor.min.js
1502 ms
media-audiovideo.min.js
1307 ms
redirect.js
1302 ms
uacf7-cf-script.js
1301 ms
multistep.js
1309 ms
progressbar.js
1319 ms
range-slider.js
1481 ms
countrySelect.js
1307 ms
script.js
1303 ms
pre-populate.js
1307 ms
scripts.js
1312 ms
frontend.js
1312 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1303 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1305 ms
waypoints.min.js
1305 ms
gtm.js
112 ms
frontend.min.js
1176 ms
logo.png
1194 ms
home_page_1_ps_png.png
2059 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
25 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
32 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
35 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf
33 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf
33 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf
32 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
34 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf
35 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf
35 ms
-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Ck_kIaWMr.ttf
36 ms
-W__XJnvUD7dzB2KYNoY.ttf
65 ms
-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cy_gIaWMr.ttf
64 ms
-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cr_sIaWMr.ttf
62 ms
-W_9XJnvUD7dzB2CA-ofTkM.ttf
64 ms
-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cv_4IaWMr.ttf
65 ms
-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2C2_8IaWMr.ttf
68 ms
-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cx_wIaWMr.ttf
65 ms
-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2C4_0IaWMr.ttf
68 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDrMfJQ.ttf
67 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4VrMDrMfJQ.ttf
65 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMDrMfJQ.ttf
67 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4ejMDrMfJQ.ttf
68 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjNDrMfJQ.ttf
68 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4bbLDrMfJQ.ttf
68 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LDrMfJQ.ttf
68 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4ejLDrMfJQ.ttf
69 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4cHLDrMfJQ.ttf
69 ms
image-23_new-1024x683.png
1296 ms
imgpsh_fullsize_animmew.png
2154 ms
image-2.png
2127 ms
arrow02.png
1275 ms
pexels-eren-li-7188737-1024x683.jpg
1717 ms
icon-4.png
1480 ms
image-34.png
1311 ms
image-21.png
2376 ms
imgpsh_fullsize_anim211.png
1522 ms
imgpsh_fullsize_anim111.png
1737 ms
Untitled-17-1.png
1923 ms
Untitled-2-1.png
2771 ms
imgpsh_fullsize_anim1.png
1764 ms
new.png
1960 ms
Untitled-1-2.png
2181 ms
blue-logo.png
1960 ms
visicase.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
visicase.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
visicase.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Visicase.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Visicase.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
visicase.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Visicase. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: