Tools & Wizards About Us
visitrochdale.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

visitrochdale.com

Welcome to the borough of Rochdale - Visit Rochdale

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

255 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

349 ms

visitrochdale.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to visitrochdale.com homepage info - get ready to check Visit Rochdale best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about visitrochdale.com

Located in the North West, between Manchester and Leeds, explore Rochdale's award winning attractions, exciting festivals, stunning scenery, bustling towns and villages…

Visit visitrochdale.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Visitrochdale.com page load time and found that the first response time was 255 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

visitrochdale.com performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,320 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.989

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

visitrochdale.com

255 ms

www.visitrochdale.com

560 ms

style_v63782858064.css

245 ms

js

66 ms

jquery.ui.datepicker-en_v63775376442.js

456 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Visitrochdale.com, 22% (16 requests) were made to Eu-assets.simpleview-europe.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Cmp.inmobi.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Eu-assets.simpleview-europe.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 295.0 kB (19%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Visitrochdale.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 216.5 kB

  • Original 243.3 kB
  • After minification 242.1 kB
  • After compression 26.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 216.5 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 65.7 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Visit Rochdale images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 108.2 kB
  • After minification 106.6 kB
  • After compression 104.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 8.8 kB

  • Original 10.6 kB
  • After minification 7.4 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Visitrochdale.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (21%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

56

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Visit Rochdale. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

visitrochdale.com

visitrochdale.com

255 ms

www.visitrochdale.com

www.visitrochdale.com

560 ms

style_v63782858064.css

style_v63782858064.css

245 ms

js

js

66 ms

jquery.ui.datepicker-en_v63775376442.js

jquery.ui.datepicker-en_v63775376442.js

456 ms

FeaturedGallery_v63856218964.js

FeaturedGallery_v63856218964.js

451 ms

js

js

158 ms

resizeiframe.js

resizeiframe.js

306 ms

jsLanguages.asp

jsLanguages.asp

317 ms

public

public

404 ms

public

public

401 ms

CookieScript.js

CookieScript.js

317 ms

CookieStyleFinal.css

CookieStyleFinal.css

381 ms

Dippy_v63782858063.js

Dippy_v63782858063.js

377 ms

DataCaptureProductList_v63856218962.js

DataCaptureProductList_v63856218962.js

303 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

35 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

53 ms

53 ms

logo_sv_madeby.png

logo_sv_madeby.png

34 ms

logo.png

logo.png

220 ms

logo_print.gif

logo_print.gif

222 ms

button_addtoitinerary.gif

button_addtoitinerary.gif

222 ms

basket_view_saved.png

basket_view_saved.png

219 ms

btn_sitesearch@x2.png

btn_sitesearch@x2.png

220 ms

icon_facebook(1).png

icon_facebook(1).png

220 ms

x_logo.png

x_logo.png

298 ms

dropdownmenux2.png

dropdownmenux2.png

305 ms

arrow_left.png

arrow_left.png

304 ms

arrow_right.png

arrow_right.png

306 ms

222 ms

76 ms

219 ms

icon_enewsletter.gif

icon_enewsletter.gif

285 ms

icon_basket.gif

icon_basket.gif

294 ms

collect

collect

35 ms

collect

collect

181 ms

mapbg_whatsnearby.png

mapbg_whatsnearby.png

323 ms

arrow_double.png

arrow_double.png

331 ms

148 ms

158 ms

166 ms

699 ms

704 ms

1053 ms

714 ms

623 ms

choice.js

choice.js

552 ms

locationLookup.asp

locationLookup.asp

280 ms

locationLookup.asp

locationLookup.asp

270 ms

locationLookup.asp

locationLookup.asp

271 ms

locationLookup.asp

locationLookup.asp

277 ms

locationLookup.asp

locationLookup.asp

296 ms

locationLookup.asp

locationLookup.asp

303 ms

locationLookup.asp

locationLookup.asp

357 ms

locationLookup.asp

locationLookup.asp

353 ms

locationLookup.asp

locationLookup.asp

355 ms

locationLookup.asp

locationLookup.asp

354 ms

arrow_left_block.png

arrow_left_block.png

316 ms

arrow_right_block.png

arrow_right_block.png

326 ms

logo_overlay.png

logo_overlay.png

379 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

380 ms

bg_message_price.png

bg_message_price.png

382 ms

bg_message_quality.png

bg_message_quality.png

385 ms

41 ms

54 ms

67 ms

89 ms

print_v63782858064.css

print_v63782858064.css

83 ms

cmp2-polyfilled.js

cmp2-polyfilled.js

7 ms

geoip

geoip

2 ms

cmp-list.json

cmp-list.json

2 ms

cmp2ui-en.js

cmp2ui-en.js

15 ms

vendor-list-trimmed-v1.json

vendor-list-trimmed-v1.json

27 ms

aem.js

aem.js

26 ms

Accessibility Review

visitrochdale.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

visitrochdale.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

visitrochdale.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Visitrochdale.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Visitrochdale.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

visitrochdale.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Visit Rochdale. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: