Tools & Wizards About Us
vistaimpact.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

vistaimpact.com

Home - Vista Impact Windows & Doors

Page Load Speed

12.1 sec in total

First Response

4.8 sec

Resources Loaded

6.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

vistaimpact.com screenshot

About Website

Visit vistaimpact.com now to see the best up-to-date Vista Impact content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vistaimpact.com

At Vista, we have high expectations, and to help us live up to them, our factory-trained craftsmen are equipped with first-rate tools and use only quality

Visit vistaimpact.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vistaimpact.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.8 sec and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vistaimpact.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.3 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value640 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.7 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vistaimpact.com

4765 ms

main.min.css

176 ms

astra-local-fonts.css

128 ms

utilities.css

248 ms

astra-addon-6703cc352438d8-63884354.css

249 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 99% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Vistaimpact.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Vistaimpact.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 378.6 kB (17%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vistaimpact.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 186.2 kB

  • Original 222.0 kB
  • After minification 216.2 kB
  • After compression 35.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 186.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vista Impact images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 69.8 kB

  • Original 230.7 kB
  • After minification 230.7 kB
  • After compression 160.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 69.8 kB or 30% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 117.0 kB

  • Original 252.3 kB
  • After minification 251.4 kB
  • After compression 135.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vistaimpact.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 117.0 kB or 46% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (71%)

Requests Now

69

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vista Impact. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vistaimpact.com

vistaimpact.com

4765 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

176 ms

astra-local-fonts.css

astra-local-fonts.css

128 ms

utilities.css

utilities.css

248 ms

astra-addon-6703cc352438d8-63884354.css

astra-addon-6703cc352438d8-63884354.css

249 ms

style.css

style.css

183 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

304 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

250 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

194 ms

post-6.css

post-6.css

249 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

261 ms

uael-frontend.min.css

uael-frontend.min.css

536 ms

wpforms-base.min.css

wpforms-base.min.css

372 ms

widget-social-icons.min.css

widget-social-icons.min.css

313 ms

brands.css

brands.css

313 ms

fontawesome.css

fontawesome.css

381 ms

solid.css

solid.css

367 ms

post-883.css

post-883.css

488 ms

css

css

33 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

490 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

429 ms

utilities.js

utilities.js

434 ms

js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js

js.cookie-2.1.3.min.js

443 ms

jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js

jquery.bind-first-0.2.3.min.js

495 ms

vimeo.min.js

vimeo.min.js

496 ms

public.js

public.js

680 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

543 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

542 ms

widget-video.min.css

widget-video.min.css

542 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

543 ms

widget-divider.min.css

widget-divider.min.css

548 ms

widget-image-carousel.min.css

widget-image-carousel.min.css

571 ms

widget-image-box.min.css

widget-image-box.min.css

577 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

574 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

577 ms

widget-counter.min.css

widget-counter.min.css

611 ms

widget-star-rating.min.css

widget-star-rating.min.css

735 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

735 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

672 ms

main.js

main.js

666 ms

astra-addon-6703cc35246f72-25038701.js

astra-addon-6703cc35246f72-25038701.js

611 ms

purify.min.js

purify.min.js

599 ms

jquery-numerator.min.js

jquery-numerator.min.js

546 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

547 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

545 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

665 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

537 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

610 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

602 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

601 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

548 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

542 ms

vista-logo-1-150x43.png

vista-logo-1-150x43.png

196 ms

ppp00002920.jpg

ppp00002920.jpg

248 ms

euro-wall-retina-logo-new1.png

euro-wall-retina-logo-new1.png

196 ms

0097-Windoor-descriptor-CMYK-removebg-preview.png

0097-Windoor-descriptor-CMYK-removebg-preview.png

197 ms

PGT-logo-blue-300x120-1.png

PGT-logo-blue-300x120-1.png

198 ms

cgi_logo.png

cgi_logo.png

210 ms

Mr-Glass-Doors-Windows-Manufacturing-LLC-MAIN-LOGO-HORIZONTAL.png

Mr-Glass-Doors-Windows-Manufacturing-LLC-MAIN-LOGO-HORIZONTAL.png

247 ms

w3.jpg

w3.jpg

287 ms

Buildertrend-Badge-circle_2c-rev-q75lgc09lvh34iwv6y48y8kuq03wtrl6tv3wgwp3wg.png

Buildertrend-Badge-circle_2c-rev-q75lgc09lvh34iwv6y48y8kuq03wtrl6tv3wgwp3wg.png

248 ms

pngwing.com_-1024x427.png

pngwing.com_-1024x427.png

248 ms

elite-solid-border-q75lgcy3spi37u7cvf6n96fb4gr6eipbv90gxpe8lc.png

elite-solid-border-q75lgcy3spi37u7cvf6n96fb4gr6eipbv90gxpe8lc.png

262 ms

w3-1024x682.jpg

w3-1024x682.jpg

288 ms

910-Parkside-1-scaled-1-1024x683-1.jpg

910-Parkside-1-scaled-1-1024x683-1.jpg

348 ms

MG_7358-scaled-1-1024x683.jpg

MG_7358-scaled-1-1024x683.jpg

355 ms

ppp00003930-2-1024x682.jpg

ppp00003930-2-1024x682.jpg

420 ms

Image_2_Final_V5_440868_PGT-scaled-1-1-1024x683.jpg

Image_2_Final_V5_440868_PGT-scaled-1-1-1024x683.jpg

330 ms

ppp00002880-1024x682.jpg

ppp00002880-1024x682.jpg

350 ms

client-1.png

client-1.png

352 ms

client-2.png

client-2.png

393 ms

ppp00002880.jpg

ppp00002880.jpg

405 ms

Accessibility Review

vistaimpact.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

vistaimpact.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

vistaimpact.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vistaimpact.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vistaimpact.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vistaimpact.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vista Impact. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: