Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

visualgrace.org

Catholic Artist and Sacred Art Painter | Visual Grace

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

124 ms

Resources Loaded

896 ms

Page Rendered

393 ms

visualgrace.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to visualgrace.org homepage info - get ready to check Visual Grace best content right away, or after learning these important things about visualgrace.org

The world may be filled with darkness, but evil does not have the last say. It's time to counteract the lies in this culture by spreading authentic beauty through sacred art. Find Original Catholic Pa...

Visit visualgrace.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Visualgrace.org page load time and found that the first response time was 124 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

visualgrace.org performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.3 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value720 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

65/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

visualgrace.org

124 ms

visualgrace.org

341 ms

js

135 ms

css

60 ms

animate.min.css

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Visualgrace.org, 24% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 14% (3 requests) were made to Lib.showit.co. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (341 ms) belongs to the original domain Visualgrace.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 612.0 kB (80%)

Content Size

766.5 kB

After Optimization

154.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Visualgrace.org main page is 766.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 671.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 612.0 kB

  • Original 671.6 kB
  • After minification 668.9 kB
  • After compression 59.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 612.0 kB or 91% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3 B

  • Original 92.2 kB
  • After minification 92.2 kB
  • After compression 92.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 43 B

  • Original 2.7 kB
  • After minification 2.7 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Visualgrace.org has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (82%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Visual Grace. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

visualgrace.org accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

visualgrace.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

visualgrace.org SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Visualgrace.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Visualgrace.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Visual Grace. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: