2.3 sec in total
29 ms
1.7 sec
598 ms
Click here to check amazing Visualvisitor content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about visualvisitor.com
Person-Level Website Visitor ID. Consent-Based Identification of the Person Visiting Your Website Including First, Last, Email.
Visit visualvisitor.comWe analyzed Visualvisitor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
visualvisitor.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value7.6 s
4/100
25%
Value8.0 s
22/100
10%
Value2,010 ms
7/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value16.0 s
6/100
10%
29 ms
485 ms
34 ms
30 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Visualvisitor.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to F.vimeocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (485 ms) belongs to the original domain Visualvisitor.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (53%)
2.9 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Visualvisitor.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 184.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Visualvisitor needs image optimization as it can save up to 184.9 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 575.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 575.9 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 710.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Visualvisitor.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 710.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (59%)
81
33
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Visualvisitor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
visualvisitor.com
29 ms
www.visualvisitor.com
485 ms
css
34 ms
page-list.css
30 ms
testimonials.css
30 ms
css
80 ms
grid.css
28 ms
base.css
29 ms
layout.css
66 ms
shortcodes.css
58 ms
magnific-popup.css
55 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
55 ms
enfold.css
69 ms
custom.css
56 ms
layerslider.css
67 ms
style.css
80 ms
preset_styles.css
74 ms
genericons.css
75 ms
font-awesome.css
76 ms
custom_script.css
78 ms
wpi_script.js
76 ms
jquery.js
91 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
88 ms
avia-compat.js
87 ms
greensock.js
88 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
84 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
86 ms
front_global.js
85 ms
front_script.js
130 ms
conversion.js
80 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
125 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
126 ms
testimonials.js
124 ms
avia.js
193 ms
shortcodes.js
204 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
191 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
209 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
216 ms
wp-embed.min.js
216 ms
main.js
217 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
325 ms
logo-300x81.png
228 ms
139002653
419 ms
liveVisitAsync.js
342 ms
355 ms
Group_Small-light.jpg
332 ms
Travelling_Man2.jpg
213 ms
Group2_Small.jpg
334 ms
Saleswoman2.jpg
332 ms
Leads_Icon.png
211 ms
identify_anyone_icon.png
333 ms
forms_icon.png
333 ms
analytics_icon.png
333 ms
quote.png
348 ms
quote2.png
348 ms
iStock_000014466180Small.jpg
362 ms
FeatureRequest-495x250.png
395 ms
identify_anyone-495x400.png
348 ms
people_icon.png
309 ms
StandingSam-285x300.png
324 ms
SittingIrv-300x240.png
324 ms
SittingLady-300x269.png
323 ms
SittingMan-300x269.png
322 ms
ga.js
289 ms
skin.css
323 ms
148 ms
prev.png
200 ms
next.png
200 ms
logo-300x81.png
199 ms
BkZwJXYnumPMepfEA344yQ.ttf
153 ms
eFfAHNfFT0YtF77QmRKRj_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
195 ms
entypo-fontello.woff
196 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
195 ms
ProcessStats.aspx
62 ms
81 ms
76 ms
__utm.gif
33 ms
player.js
136 ms
player.css
126 ms
ga.js
88 ms
vuid.min.js
133 ms
print.css
12 ms
__utm.gif
31 ms
__utm.gif
61 ms
__utm.gif
62 ms
550247289.jpg
129 ms
139002653.json
208 ms
139002653.json
226 ms
550247289_640.jpg
152 ms
skin.png
12 ms
visualvisitor.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
visualvisitor.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
visualvisitor.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Visualvisitor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Visualvisitor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
visualvisitor.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Visualvisitor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: