Tools & Wizards About Us
vitaestetic.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

vitaestetic.com

Hair Transplant Turkey | Plastic Surgery | Vita Estetic

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

108 ms

Resources Loaded

987 ms

Page Rendered

1 sec

vitaestetic.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Vita Estetic content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vitaestetic.com

With our affordable prices, exceptional services, and high-quality treatments, Vita Estetic offers the best hair transplant Turkey and Plastic Surgery.

Visit vitaestetic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vitaestetic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 108 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vitaestetic.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,320 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.141

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.8 s

44/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vitaestetic.com

108 ms

vitaestetic.com

58 ms

main.min.css

43 ms

css

42 ms

style.min.css

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Vitaestetic.com, 12% (6 requests) were made to Provenexpert.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (670 ms) relates to the external source App.addstars.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 327.9 kB (36%)

Content Size

921.5 kB

After Optimization

593.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vitaestetic.com main page is 921.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 378.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 318.1 kB

  • Original 378.3 kB
  • After minification 378.2 kB
  • After compression 60.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 318.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 38 B

  • Original 276.8 kB
  • After minification 276.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vita Estetic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 696 B

  • Original 170.7 kB
  • After minification 170.7 kB
  • After compression 170.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 95.7 kB
  • After minification 95.7 kB
  • After compression 86.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vitaestetic.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (75%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vita Estetic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vitaestetic.com

vitaestetic.com

108 ms

vitaestetic.com

vitaestetic.com

58 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

43 ms

css

css

42 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

52 ms

spectra-block-positioning.min.css

spectra-block-positioning.min.css

55 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

65 ms

uag-css-242.css

uag-css-242.css

71 ms

astra-addon-65d449f51cf650-67914199.css

astra-addon-65d449f51cf650-67914199.css

66 ms

uag-css-2485.css

uag-css-2485.css

92 ms

uag-css-2467.css

uag-css-2467.css

93 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

96 ms

breeze-prefetch-links.min.js

breeze-prefetch-links.min.js

108 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

110 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

120 ms

js

js

90 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

93 ms

bar_vita-estetic.js

bar_vita-estetic.js

245 ms

script

script

515 ms

choices.css

choices.css

211 ms

fluent-forms-public.css

fluent-forms-public.css

207 ms

fluentform-public-default.css

fluentform-public-default.css

209 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

214 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

213 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

241 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

241 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

243 ms

main.js

main.js

241 ms

spectra-block-positioning.min.js

spectra-block-positioning.min.js

241 ms

modal.min.js

modal.min.js

243 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

374 ms

uag-js-242.js

uag-js-242.js

349 ms

astra-addon-65d449f51e34c5-08067218.js

astra-addon-65d449f51e34c5-08067218.js

348 ms

breeze-lazy-load.min.js

breeze-lazy-load.min.js

348 ms

reviews

reviews

670 ms

choices.min.js

choices.min.js

373 ms

form-submission.js

form-submission.js

373 ms

hair-Trasplant-consultation-Turkey.jpg

hair-Trasplant-consultation-Turkey.jpg

199 ms

diagnostic-lab-content-gradient-bg.svg

diagnostic-lab-content-gradient-bg.svg

195 ms

blob4.svg

blob4.svg

194 ms

rounded.svg

rounded.svg

258 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

173 ms

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uw.ttf

iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uw.ttf

34 ms

cropped-cropped-logo-11-2-190x91.png

cropped-cropped-logo-11-2-190x91.png

43 ms

Untitled-design-3.jpg

Untitled-design-3.jpg

37 ms

provenexpert_logo_black.png

provenexpert_logo_black.png

23 ms

browserbar.css

browserbar.css

22 ms

bubble.png

bubble.png

34 ms

titilliumweb-regular-webfont.woff

titilliumweb-regular-webfont.woff

5 ms

titilliumweb-semibold-webfont.woff

titilliumweb-semibold-webfont.woff

38 ms

Accessibility Review

vitaestetic.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

vitaestetic.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

vitaestetic.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vitaestetic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vitaestetic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vitaestetic.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vita Estetic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: