5.3 sec in total
1.4 sec
3.4 sec
494 ms
Visit vitaflora.lt now to see the best up-to-date Vitaflora content for Lithuania and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vitaflora.lt
Augalai internetu su pristatymu į namus
Visit vitaflora.ltWe analyzed Vitaflora.lt page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
vitaflora.lt performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value9.1 s
1/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value1,640 ms
12/100
30%
Value0.338
33/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
1405 ms
232 ms
233 ms
230 ms
31 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Vitaflora.lt, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Vitaflora.lt.
Page size can be reduced by 493.0 kB (30%)
1.6 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Vitaflora.lt main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vitaflora images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 293.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 293.1 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 81.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vitaflora.lt needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 81.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (52%)
64
31
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vitaflora. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vitaflora.lt
1405 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
232 ms
modal.css
233 ms
template.css
230 ms
jquery.min.js
31 ms
jquery.noconflict.js
231 ms
vmsite.js
251 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
252 ms
vmprices.js
345 ms
mootools-core.js
498 ms
core.js
348 ms
modal.js
347 ms
mootools-more.js
721 ms
vm-flexi.css
350 ms
reset.css
459 ms
text.css
461 ms
grid.css
463 ms
layout.css
470 ms
nav.css
575 ms
typography.css
576 ms
template.css
583 ms
moomenu.js
586 ms
wtpQualitySigns.js
847 ms
webfont.js
80 ms
vitaflora_logo_cmyk_small.png
158 ms
phonemail.png
156 ms
register-icon.png
159 ms
login-icon.png
156 ms
social-sprite.png
159 ms
top-menu-bg.png
159 ms
ul-li-default.png
270 ms
lt.gif
270 ms
en.gif
272 ms
ru.gif
270 ms
side-menu-li-a.png
270 ms
arrow_down.png
275 ms
9b2dd2747307358b43e2e74ec08be00b.jpg
501 ms
544005_v_t5_217x217.jpg
383 ms
edb1637d3a79b62d96cb3a7836d81b41.jpg
653 ms
reka7_217x217.png
727 ms
rumba12_217x217.png
732 ms
ostara_217x217.png
654 ms
dccac3ff06f772345679fed3aadb70c7.png
725 ms
smaragd-9-40_217x217.jpg
652 ms
malwina7_217x217.png
1061 ms
northla_217x217.jpg
732 ms
sonata_217x217.png
962 ms
4de61353efd7429662cba7e096e70d6c.png
1066 ms
honeyoe1_217x217.png
1070 ms
ines6_217x217.png
965 ms
112ad1f012b679c47351dd6c6e774b22.jpg
960 ms
css
43 ms
site-name-handler-bg.png
1013 ms
vert-sep.png
1013 ms
footer-bg.png
1018 ms
analytics.js
29 ms
41943
444 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
26 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
53 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
65 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
65 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
64 ms
ecommerce.js
13 ms
collect
75 ms
collect
32 ms
ga-audiences
37 ms
panel-hide.png
531 ms
user_green.png
536 ms
textfield_key.png
541 ms
icon_lt.png
119 ms
print.css
119 ms
vitaflora.lt accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
vitaflora.lt best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
vitaflora.lt SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
LT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vitaflora.lt can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Lithuanian language. Our system also found out that Vitaflora.lt main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vitaflora.lt
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vitaflora. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: