Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

vitaler.co

AI-Powered Patient Experience | Vital

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

133 ms

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

vitaler.co screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Vital Er content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vitaler.co

AI-Powered digital experiences for the most vital points in care.

Visit vitaler.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Vitaler.co page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vitaler.co performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

54/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.7 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vitaler.com

133 ms

vitaler.com

258 ms

vital.io

698 ms

2a2f70b37f42c2a4.css

16 ms

4a10c1f5f6abb656.css

325 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Vitaler.co, 6% (2 requests) were made to Vitaler.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) relates to the external source Vital.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 100.3 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Vitaler.co main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 88.3 kB

  • Original 110.2 kB
  • After minification 109.8 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 206 B

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vital Er images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 442 B

  • Original 109.9 kB
  • After minification 109.9 kB
  • After compression 109.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 11.3 kB

  • Original 14.9 kB
  • After minification 14.9 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vitaler.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (15%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

23

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vital Er. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

vitaler.co accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

vitaler.co best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

vitaler.co SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vitaler.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vitaler.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vital Er. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: