Tools & Wizards About Us
vitaler.co screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

vitaler.co

AI-Powered Patient Experience | Vital

Page Load Speed

697 ms in total

First Response

169 ms

Resources Loaded

528 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

vitaler.co screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Vital Er content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vitaler.co

AI-Powered digital experiences for the most vital points in care.

Visit vitaler.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Vitaler.co page load time and found that the first response time was 169 ms and then it took 528 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vitaler.co performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

45/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,620 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vitaler.com

169 ms

vitaler.com

255 ms

vital.io

59 ms

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

4 ms

webpack-b2d910429f4dd99a.js

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Vitaler.co, 25% (2 requests) were made to Vitaler.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (255 ms) relates to the external source Vitaler.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 50.3 kB (30%)

Content Size

170.3 kB

After Optimization

120.0 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Vitaler.co main page is 170.3 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 109.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 49.9 kB

  • Original 60.5 kB
  • After minification 60.5 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 427 B

  • Original 109.9 kB
  • After minification 109.9 kB
  • After compression 109.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (80%)

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

1

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vital Er. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vitaler.com

vitaler.com

169 ms

vitaler.com

vitaler.com

255 ms

vital.io

vital.io

59 ms

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

polyfills-78c92fac7aa8fdd8.js

4 ms

webpack-b2d910429f4dd99a.js

webpack-b2d910429f4dd99a.js

27 ms

1dd3208c-050ce2bed98fec93.js

1dd3208c-050ce2bed98fec93.js

25 ms

3575-94993e7c0892ff60.js

3575-94993e7c0892ff60.js

25 ms

main-app-50d5d72cda97a807.js

main-app-50d5d72cda97a807.js

22 ms

Accessibility Review

vitaler.co accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

vitaler.co best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

vitaler.co SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vitaler.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Vitaler.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vitaler.co

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vital Er. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: