4.6 sec in total
500 ms
2.1 sec
2 sec
Welcome to vitavidavie.com homepage info - get ready to check Vitavidavie best content right away, or after learning these important things about vitavidavie.com
Visit vitavidavie.comWe analyzed Vitavidavie.com page load time and found that the first response time was 500 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
vitavidavie.com performance score
500 ms
26 ms
160 ms
201 ms
164 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Vitavidavie.com, 17% (13 requests) were made to Vitavidavie.files.wordpress.com and 15% (11 requests) were made to S0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Vitavidavie.files.wordpress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 611.5 kB (22%)
2.8 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Vitavidavie.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.2 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vitavidavie images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 525.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 525.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vitavidavie.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (56%)
62
27
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vitavidavie. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vitavidavie.com
500 ms
webfont.js
26 ms
160 ms
css
201 ms
164 ms
global.css
156 ms
164 ms
style.css
163 ms
gprofiles.js
184 ms
wpgroho.js
168 ms
167 ms
jetpack-carousel.css
166 ms
tiled-gallery.css
166 ms
179 ms
widgets.js
242 ms
169 ms
725X1342.skimlinks.js
149 ms
w.js
128 ms
merriweather.css
14 ms
global-print.css
4 ms
image1-1.jpg
391 ms
img_3685.jpeg
416 ms
img_3685.jpeg
408 ms
fullsizerender.jpg
406 ms
fullsizerender.jpg
408 ms
img_3211.jpg
527 ms
img_3374.png
988 ms
img_3372-0.jpg
573 ms
img_3372.jpg
542 ms
1.jpg
539 ms
picture1.png
1212 ms
g.jpg
652 ms
11.jpg
639 ms
platform.js
289 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGEBls_1aQwi4AfipSOlE3SU.ttf
327 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlFzCdIATDt8zXO3QNtzVeJ8.ttf
348 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGGvd-IutAbwf5FQ8ZpuI2w4.ttf
365 ms
l1cOQ90roY9yC7voEhngDKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
367 ms
AWM5wXtMJeRP-AcRTgT4qQ.ttf
366 ms
cj2hUnSRBhwmSPr9kS589-LrC4Du4e_yfTJ8Ol60xk0.ttf
366 ms
Genericons.svg
285 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
1 ms
Noticons.svg
171 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
150 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
168 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
168 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
187 ms
px.gif
128 ms
126 ms
hovercard.css
138 ms
services.css
178 ms
button.65b4bc8f0d6592fdc51d322b3f197660.js
256 ms
px.gif
45 ms
g.gif
32 ms
index.html
25 ms
g.gif
28 ms
g.gif
28 ms
jquery.js
42 ms
postmessage.js
43 ms
jed.js
42 ms
underscore.min.js
43 ms
jquery.wpcom-proxy-request.js
2 ms
36 ms
follow_button.64a917b4a230f163048902c783e1530f.en.html
55 ms
11 ms
follow-rest.js
25 ms
batch
31 ms
http%3A%2F%2Fvitavidavie.com
42 ms
style.css
8 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzKRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
8 ms
jot
87 ms
link
7 ms
track.php
9 ms
1f370.svg
17 ms
1f423.svg
5 ms
vitavidavie.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vitavidavie.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vitavidavie.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vitavidavie.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vitavidavie. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: