7.4 sec in total
538 ms
5.8 sec
1.1 sec
Visit vitcompany.ru now to see the best up-to-date Vitcompany content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vitcompany.ru
Visit vitcompany.ruWe analyzed Vitcompany.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 538 ms and then it took 6.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
vitcompany.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value14.4 s
0/100
25%
Value9.9 s
10/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.033
100/100
15%
Value8.9 s
35/100
10%
538 ms
742 ms
61 ms
10 ms
275 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Vitcompany.ru, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Vitcompany.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 234.9 kB (1%)
17.7 MB
17.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Vitcompany.ru main page is 17.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 17.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 101.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.5 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 114.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vitcompany images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vitcompany.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.1 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (63%)
73
27
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vitcompany. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vitcompany.ru
538 ms
vitcompany.ru
742 ms
gtm.js
61 ms
watch.js
10 ms
vitcompany.ru
275 ms
normalize.css
398 ms
cui-base.css
415 ms
cui-fgrid.css
415 ms
magnific-popup.css
416 ms
popup.css
417 ms
ui.font.opensans.min.css
417 ms
main.popup.bundle.min.css
534 ms
swiper.min.css
550 ms
jquery.citrusObjectsMap.css
551 ms
bootstrap.css
552 ms
bootstrap-select.min.css
553 ms
css
36 ms
page_e4423297ce571e5c899416fed205ba23_v1.css
553 ms
popup.min.css
671 ms
template_498d45e4771fbc3b794643bc8427655c_v1.css
825 ms
core.min.js
965 ms
kernel_main_v1.js
830 ms
kernel_main_polyfill_customevent_v1.js
689 ms
dexie.bitrix.bundle.min.js
833 ms
core_ls.min.js
808 ms
core_frame_cache.min.js
830 ms
protobuf.min.js
947 ms
model.min.js
961 ms
rest.client.min.js
980 ms
pull.client.min.js
981 ms
jquery-3.3.1.min.min.js
1112 ms
inView.min.js
1085 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1098 ms
popup.js
1100 ms
embed-responsive.js
1103 ms
main.popup.bundle.min.js
1107 ms
swiper.min.js
1227 ms
grids.min.js
1235 ms
countUp.min.js
1237 ms
ymaps-touch-scroll.min.js
1240 ms
css2
48 ms
jquery.citrusObjectsMap.js
1242 ms
analytics.js
15 ms
linkid.js
6 ms
collect
11 ms
collect
24 ms
js
58 ms
jquery.citrusRealtyAddress.js
979 ms
bootstrap.min.js
976 ms
bootstrap-select.js
966 ms
wNumb.js
968 ms
template_6573f2e96ce71b8067d96d10373a7ece_v1.js
968 ms
ba.js
282 ms
hrkeuz5930o3gl9e7i8kewqmc6lho5b4.jpg
140 ms
pwo2fs2d3uf7zpoa38qie3z0j1p9gfv8.jpg
557 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf
46 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf
47 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAw.ttf
56 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAw.ttf
63 ms
icomoon.ttf
287 ms
94kbtvzdit5j1j6jyfrq5mijxbfzqpno.jpg
3054 ms
o8of074ojybzozjtaqxvn2i3pz4kng90.jpg
849 ms
n4npm8yoe7v310xp62f8x58b5v6584rh.jpg
845 ms
j5ifl15qkfvaolsyw22dw2ujtrw9wa23.jpg
644 ms
7kpha9u7dovz3qz1fycrlyerq2maeebr.jpg
1073 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDrMfJQ.ttf
13 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LDrMfJQ.ttf
38 ms
h710xcy2yf807examg1zloudfdcb6ni7.jpg
900 ms
68hv0ktcon632hxi26jaksfyip5vzubz.jpg
1008 ms
htid1nswp5oxgyzav8zid0btqfdxao0o.jpg
1049 ms
xp7r1f39ae7pih6lkuuc6hdpppdkb0wn.jpg
918 ms
5jm9hma9nah47rqy2tsbedtnx55xgfj4.jpg
1150 ms
d5fp1y6jvcqfjgcvaf5rvx0rk773epzw.jpg
1201 ms
4qpx0ku2ztk1vjh4yfi2imcrqc1e82tr.jpg
1152 ms
yoiluhiqdl83c9gn276jukugebljylkg.jpg
1452 ms
pw73zxxpx6qxouccrx50b4wxobwmeecq.jpg
1319 ms
fuwar4zwemgt186n6tm4rnc9bpdlytdk.jpg
1443 ms
tt6eseswemczzwnyyw1ctt9utb75ckod.jpg
1925 ms
c7mdpo1vjlq6er5uy5nqge2qt7p72ba8.jpg
1341 ms
kzjn20ivss1jqo2irqoh1hvs3wi34rv0.jpg
1602 ms
8v2i1fc10c1lqw2yr3crleskobpve2yi.jpg
1467 ms
veq0dk0mk5a9v5snmmom4cdhpret7xqv.jpg
1568 ms
n48m618b1ewlvchdura1dyzv03vlttts.jpg
1572 ms
vitcompany.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
vitcompany.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
vitcompany.ru SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vitcompany.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vitcompany.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vitcompany.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vitcompany. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: