Tools & Wizards About Us
vitraders.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

vitraders.in

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

1 sec

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

216 ms

vitraders.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to vitraders.in homepage info - get ready to check Vitraders best content right away, or after learning these important things about vitraders.in

Dealsers of Vishal Industial Traders deals with Helicoil Inserts, Unbrako High Tensile Fasteners, LPS Fasteners in Mumbai, India

Visit vitraders.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Vitraders.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vitraders.in performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.1 s

21/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,630 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.5 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

vitraders.in

1009 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

56 ms

style.min.css

106 ms

styles.css

107 ms

all.min.css

180 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Vitraders.in, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Vitraders.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 748.2 kB (69%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

333.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vitraders.in main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 616.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 51.4 kB

  • Original 63.8 kB
  • After minification 62.1 kB
  • After compression 12.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 152.0 kB
  • After minification 152.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vitraders images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 170.5 kB

  • Original 248.6 kB
  • After minification 248.6 kB
  • After compression 78.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 170.5 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 526.3 kB

  • Original 616.8 kB
  • After minification 614.9 kB
  • After compression 90.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vitraders.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 526.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (86%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vitraders. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

vitraders.in

vitraders.in

1009 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

56 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

106 ms

styles.css

styles.css

107 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

180 ms

simple-line-icons.min.css

simple-line-icons.min.css

117 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

279 ms

hamburgers.min.css

hamburgers.min.css

120 ms

collapse.css

collapse.css

128 ms

89f931ce71e2fd25423e038f15c639da.css

89f931ce71e2fd25423e038f15c639da.css

128 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

152 ms

frontend-legacy.min.css

frontend-legacy.min.css

157 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

226 ms

post-836.css

post-836.css

157 ms

post-396.css

post-396.css

171 ms

widgets.css

widgets.css

299 ms

css

css

47 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

310 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

250 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

248 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

248 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

249 ms

index.js

index.js

250 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

282 ms

theme.min.js

theme.min.js

454 ms

drop-down-mobile-menu.min.js

drop-down-mobile-menu.min.js

455 ms

magnific-popup.min.js

magnific-popup.min.js

454 ms

ow-lightbox.min.js

ow-lightbox.min.js

455 ms

flickity.pkgd.min.js

flickity.pkgd.min.js

472 ms

ow-slider.min.js

ow-slider.min.js

455 ms

scroll-effect.min.js

scroll-effect.min.js

470 ms

scroll-top.min.js

scroll-top.min.js

469 ms

select.min.js

select.min.js

470 ms

share.min.js

share.min.js

479 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

479 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

479 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

479 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

503 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

517 ms

share-link.min.js

share-link.min.js

442 ms

dialog.min.js

dialog.min.js

436 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

422 ms

preloaded-modules.min.js

preloaded-modules.min.js

430 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

419 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

420 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

393 ms

index_01.jpg

index_01.jpg

184 ms

home-banner.jpg

home-banner.jpg

189 ms

p_3.png

p_3.png

185 ms

p_2.png

p_2.png

186 ms

p_1.png

p_1.png

187 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

101 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

100 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

103 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

101 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf

101 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

105 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf

102 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

103 ms

Simple-Line-Icons.ttf

Simple-Line-Icons.ttf

104 ms

Accessibility Review

vitraders.in accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

vitraders.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

vitraders.in SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vitraders.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Vitraders.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vitraders.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vitraders. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: